Calibration of CO, NO2, and O3 Using Airify: A Low-Cost Sensor Cluster for Air Quality Monitoring

During the last decade, extensive research has been carried out on the subject of low-cost sensor platforms for air quality monitoring. A key aspect when deploying such systems is the quality of the measured data. Calibration is especially important to improve the data quality of low-cost air monitoring devices. The measured data quality must comply with regulations issued by national or international authorities in order to be used for regulatory purposes. This work discusses the challenges and methods suitable for calibrating a low-cost sensor platform developed by our group, Airify, that has a unit cost five times less expensive than the state-of-the-art solutions (approximately €1000). The evaluated platform can integrate a wide variety of sensors capable of measuring up to 12 parameters, including the regulatory pollutants defined in the European Directive. In this work, we developed new calibration models (multivariate linear regression and random forest) and evaluated their effectiveness in meeting the data quality objective (DQO) for the following parameters: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The experimental results show that the proposed calibration managed an improvement of 12% for the CO and O3 gases and a similar accuracy for the NO2 gas compared to similar state-of-the-art studies. The evaluated parameters had different calibration accuracies due to the non-identical levels of gas concentration at which the sensors were exposed during the model’s training phase. After the calibration algorithms were applied to the evaluated platform, its performance met the DQO criteria despite the overall low price level of the platform.

[1]  Manuel Aleixandre,et al.  Performance evaluation of amperometric sensors for the monitoring of O3 and NO2 in ambient air at ppb level , 2015 .

[2]  Laurent Spinelle,et al.  AirSensEUR: An Open-Designed Multi-Sensor Platform for Air Quality Monitoring , 2015 .

[3]  Ronak Sutaria,et al.  Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  Marian-Emanuel Ionascu,et al.  Variance Analysis of Signals from Four Electrode Electrochemical Sensors , 2019, 2019 27th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR).

[5]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[6]  P. Schneider,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor for a near Four-Month Period in Oslo, Norway , 2019, Atmosphere.

[7]  M. Salvato,et al.  Is on field calibration strategy robust to relocation? , 2017, 2017 ISOCS/IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN).

[8]  H. Volten,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Platform for Public Information on Air Quality, Sensor Measurements, and Citizen Science , 2019, Atmosphere.

[9]  Andrea Polidori,et al.  Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement? , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[11]  N. Castell,et al.  Toward a Unified Terminology of Processing Levels for Low-Cost Air-Quality Sensors. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S. Hewitt,et al.  2008 , 2018, Los 25 años de la OMC: Una retrospectiva fotográfica.

[13]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide (cid:2) , 2022 .

[14]  J. Kindle,et al.  Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment , 2009 .

[15]  R. P. Otjes,et al.  Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir Joint Exercise – Part II , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[16]  Olalekan Popoola,et al.  Development of a baseline-temperature correction methodology for electrochemical sensors and its implications for long-term stability , 2016 .

[17]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost commercially available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part B: NO, CO and CO2 , 2017 .

[18]  Marian-Emanuel Ionascu,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Measurement , 2018, 2018 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI).

[19]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Calibration of low-cost NO2 sensors in an urban air quality network , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.

[20]  David E Williams,et al.  Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks. , 2018, ACS sensors.

[21]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Sensing the Air We Breathe – the OpenSense Dataset , 2012 .

[22]  Alena Bartonova,et al.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? , 2017, Environment international.

[23]  Laurent Francis,et al.  Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise , 2016 .

[24]  Carl Malings,et al.  Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[25]  Sven Schade,et al.  Next Generation Air Quality Platform: Openness and Interoperability for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[26]  Elena Esposito,et al.  Calibrating chemical multisensory devices for real world applications: An in-depth comparison of quantitative Machine Learning approaches , 2017, ArXiv.

[27]  E. Bezirtzoglou,et al.  Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review , 2020, Frontiers in Public Health.