Applying Model Based Techniques for Early Safety Evaluation of an Automotive Architecture in Compliance with the ISO 26262 Standard

In 2011, the automotive industry introduced the application of a standardized process for functional safety-related development of automotive electronic products. The related international standard, ISO 26262 functional safety for road vehicles, has high demands on process documentation and analysis. Within an engineering context this challenges the tremendous increase of complexity for modern automotive systems and high productivity demands for industrial competiveness purpose. Model based development techniques based on an Architecture Description Language (ADL) has been identified as the best candidate to manage the system complexity and the related safety analysis with the benefit of formal description and capabilities for test automation. The proposed concept relies on the definition of a compositional error modeling approach tightly coupled with the system architecture model, capable to analyze the software and hardware architectures and implementations. This paper explains the results of the language extension based on the EAST-ADL and AUTOSAR domain model in terms of early safety evaluation of an automotive architecture, automating the qualitative and quantitative assessment of road vehicle products as claimed by the application of the ISO 26262.

[1]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[2]  Jin-Hee Cho,et al.  Automotive hardware development according to ISO 26262 , 2011, 13th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT2011).

[3]  Klaus D. Müller-Glaser,et al.  Rapid safety evaluation of hardware architectural designs compliant with ISO 26262 , 2013, 2013 International Symposium on Rapid System Prototyping (RSP).

[4]  Klaus D. Müller-Glaser,et al.  Performing Safety Evaluation on Detailed Hardware Level according to ISO 26262 , 2013 .

[5]  Karama Kanoun,et al.  A System Dependability Modeling Framework Using AADL and GSPNs , 2006, WADS.

[6]  Marco Bozzano,et al.  ESACS: an integrated methodology for design and safety analysis of complex systems , 2003 .

[7]  R. Bell,et al.  IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/electronic/ programme electronic safety-related systems: overview , 1999 .

[8]  Sylvain Metge,et al.  Safety assessment with AltaRica - Lessons learnt based on two aircraft system studies , 2004, IFIP Congress Topical Sessions.

[9]  Klaus D. Müller-Glaser,et al.  Graphically notated fault modeling and safety analysis in the context of electric and electronic architecture development and functional safety , 2012, 2012 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Rapid System Prototyping (RSP).

[10]  Antoine Rauzy,et al.  The AltaRica Formalism for Describing Concurrent Systems , 1999, Fundam. Informaticae.

[11]  Janette Cardoso,et al.  Toward a methodology for the AltaRica modelling of multi-physical systems , 2010 .

[12]  Martin Walker,et al.  Engineering failure analysis and design optimisation with HiP-HOPS , 2011 .