Single trial detection of human vestibular evoked myogenic potentials is determined by signal-to-noise ratio.

Vestibular reflexes in humans can be assessed by means of acoustically evoked responses of myogenic origin. For the vestibular-collic pathway this is termed the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (or VEMP) and for the vestibular-ocular pathway the ocular VEMP (or OVEMP). Usually VEMPs require an averaging process to obtain a clear response against the background myogenic activity, but depending on the combination of target reflex and stimulus mode, in some cases clear responses can be observed in single trials without averaging. We aimed to test whether this difference in detectability was simply related to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), or a manifestation of some other difference in the reflex pathways. In four healthy subjects we recorded VEMPs and OVEMPs in response to 2-ms, 500-Hz sound pips and 10-ms, 100-Hz transmastoid vibrations at four intensity levels, and also determined thresholds. A plot of probability of detection P vs. SNR for all subjects and conditions fell onto a single sigmoid curve. When fitted by a logistic function after linearization a regression yielded an R(2) of 0.89 (n = 64, p < 0.001), with parameter estimates of mu = 2.9 and sigma = 2.0. Three patients with superior canal dehiscence, characterized by significantly lowered thresholds for sound-activated responses, exhibited a similar detection curve. We conclude that single trial detection of evoked myogenic potentials is a property mainly determined by SNR. Thus vestibular reflexes, differing in both their response magnitude and in their levels of myogenic activity by more than an order of magnitude, can be described by a single relationship when their magnitude is expressed relative to background activity, demonstrating the fundamental importance of the SNR.

[1]  James G. Colebatch Properties of rectified averaging of an evoked-type signal: theory and application to the vestibular-evoked myogenic potential , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Low-frequency tuning in the human vestibular–ocular projection is determined by both peripheral and central mechanisms , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by brief interaural head acceleration: properties and possible origin. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  J. Colebatch,et al.  A utricular origin of frequency tuning to low-frequency vibration in the human vestibular system? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Tuning and sensitivity of the human vestibular system to low-frequency vibration , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) produced by impulsive transmastoid accelerations , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) in superior canal dehiscence , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Vestibular-evoked extraocular potentials by air-conducted sound: Another clinical test for vestibular function , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in superior canal dehiscence , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[10]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted sound , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Juno Kim,et al.  Bone conducted vibration selectively activates irregular primary otolithic vestibular neurons in the guinea pig , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  L. Minor Clinical Manifestations of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  G M Halmagyi,et al.  Vestibular activation by bone conducted sound , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  K. Kaga,et al.  Bone-conducted evoked myogenic potentials from the sternocleidomastoid muscle. , 2000, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  N. Isu,et al.  Sacculo-ocular reflex connectivity in cats , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  N. Todd,et al.  A saccular origin of frequency tuning in myogenic vestibular evoked potentials?: implications for human responses to loud sounds , 2000, Hearing Research.

[17]  N. Isu,et al.  Utriculoocular reflex arc of the cat. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. McCue,et al.  Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  G M Halmagyi,et al.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  Davis Coakley,et al.  Neuro-muscular model of ocular microtremor , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Y. Cazals,et al.  Acoustic responses recorded from the saccular bundle on the eighth nerve of the guinea pig , 1989, Hearing Research.

[22]  E D Young,et al.  Responses of squirrel monkey vestibular neurons to audio-frequency sound and head vibration. , 1977, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[23]  U Rosenhall,et al.  Vestibular Macular Mapping in Man , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[24]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Dual projections of secondary vestibular axons in the medial longitudinal fasciculus to extraocular motor nuclei and the spinal cord of the squirrel monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  A. Tribukait,et al.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[26]  I S Curthoys,et al.  Physiological and anatomical study of click-sensitive primary vestibular afferents in the guinea pig. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[27]  Y. Uchino Connections between otolith receptors and neck motoneurons. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.