The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.

PURPOSE The comminution of kidney stones in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a dose dependent process caused primarily by the combination of 2 fundamental mechanisms, namely stress waves and cavitation. The effect of treatment strategy with emphasis on enhancing the effect of stress waves or cavitation on stone comminution in SWL was investigated. Because vascular injury in SWL is also dose dependent, optimization of the treatment strategy may produce improved stone comminution with decreased tissue injury in SWL. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using an in vitro experiment system that mimics stone fragmentation in the renal pelvis spherical BegoStone (Bego USA, Smithfield, Rhode Island) phantoms (diameter 10 mm) were exposed to 1,500 shocks at a pulse repetition rate of 1 Hz in an unmodified HM-3 lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Kennesaw, Georgia). The 3 treatment strategies used were increasing output voltage from 18 to 20 and then to 22 kV every 500 shocks with emphasis on enhancing the effect of cavitation on medium fragments (2 to 4 mm) at the final treatment stage, decreasing output voltage from 22 to 20 and then to 18 kV every 500 shocks with emphasis on enhancing the effect of stress waves on large fragments (greater than 4 mm) at the initial treatment stage and maintaining a constant output voltage at 20 kV, as typically used in SWL procedures. Following shock wave exposure the size distribution of fragments was determined by the sequential sieving method. In addition, pressure waveforms at lithotripter focus (F2) produced at different output settings were measured using a fiber optic probe hydrophone. RESULTS The rate of stone comminution in SWL varied significantly in a dose dependent manner depending on the treatment strategies used. Specifically the comminution efficiencies produced by the 3 strategies after the initial 500 shocks were 30.7%, 59% and 41.9%, respectively. After 1,000 shocks the corresponding comminution efficiencies became similar (60.2%, 68.1% and 66.4%, respectively) with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.08). After 1,500 shocks the final comminution efficiency produced by the first strategy was 88.7%, which was better than the corresponding values of 81.2% and 83.5%, respectively, for the other 2 strategies. The difference between the final comminution efficiency of the first and second strategies was statistically significant (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Progressive increase in lithotripter output voltage can produce the best overall stone comminution in vitro.

[1]  A. Hendrikx,et al.  Efficacy of second generation lithotriptors: a multicenter comparative study of 2,206 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone lithotriptors. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[2]  P. Zhong,et al.  Dynamic photoelastic study of the transient stress field in solids during shock wave lithotripsy. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Alken,et al.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Lawrence A. Crum,et al.  Acoustic cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter , 1986 .

[5]  G M Preminger,et al.  Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. II: Application in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Pei Zhong,et al.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  W. Eisenmenger,et al.  The first clinical results of "wide-focus and low-pressure" ESWL. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  C J Chuong,et al.  Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. I: Theoretical formulation. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  F. Kahmann,et al.  Experimental basis of shockwave-induced renal trauma in the model of the canine kidney , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  W. Brendel,et al.  Biological effects of shock waves: kidney damage by shock waves in dogs--dose dependence. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  P. Zhong,et al.  Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: methodology and in vitro experiments. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Yufeng Zhou,et al.  Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: refinement of reflector geometry. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B. Finlayson,et al.  An experimental model for the systematic investigation of stone fracture by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[14]  C. Chaussy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: New Aspects in the Treatment of Kidney Stone Disease , 1982 .

[15]  M. Delius Medical applications and bioeffects of extracorporeal shock waves , 1994 .

[16]  J. Seifert,et al.  The mechanisms of stone disintegration by shock waves. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  B. Sturtevant,et al.  Fracture mechanics model of stone comminution in ESWL and implications for tissue damage. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.