Improving the Robustness of Electromyogram-Pattern Recognition for Prosthetic Control by a Postprocessing Strategy

Electromyogram (EMG) contains rich information for motion decoding. As one of its major applications, EMG-pattern recognition (PR)-based control of prostheses has been proposed and investigated in the field of rehabilitation robotics for decades. These prostheses can offer a higher level of dexterity compared to the commercially available ones. However, limited progress has been made toward clinical application of EMG-PR-based prostheses, due to their unsatisfactory robustness against various interferences during daily use. These interferences may lead to misclassifications of motion intentions, which damage the control performance of EMG-PR-based prostheses. A number of studies have applied methods that undergo a postprocessing stage to determine the current motion outputs, based on previous outputs or other information, which have proved effective in reducing erroneous outputs. In this study, we proposed a postprocessing strategy that locks the outputs during the constant contraction to block out occasional misclassifications, upon detecting the motion onset using a threshold. The strategy was investigated using three different motion onset detectors, namely mean absolute value, Teager–Kaiser energy operator, or mechanomyogram (MMG). Our results indicate that the proposed strategy could suppress erroneous outputs, during rest and constant contractions in particular. In addition, with MMG as the motion onset detector, the strategy was found to produce the most significant improvement in the performance, reducing the total errors up to around 50% (from 22.9 to 11.5%) in comparison to the original classification output in the online test, and it is the most robust against threshold value changes. We speculate that motion onset detectors that are both smooth and responsive would further enhance the efficacy of the proposed postprocessing strategy, which would facilitate the clinical application of EMG-PR-based prosthetic control.

[1]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Teager-Kaiser Operator improves the accuracy of EMG onset detection independent of signal-to-noise ratio. , 2008, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[5]  Tanu Sharma,et al.  A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern recognition , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  Self-Correcting Pattern Recognition System of Surface EMG Signals for Upper Limb Prosthesis Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  A Novel Feature Extraction for Robust EMG Pattern Recognition , 2009, ArXiv.

[8]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[9]  P. Dario,et al.  Artificial neural network model of the mapping between electromyographic activation and trajectory patterns in free-arm movements , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  A. Phinyomark,et al.  An optimal wavelet function based on wavelet denoising for multifunction myoelectric control , 2009, 2009 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology.

[11]  Hui Wang,et al.  Pattern recognition of electromyography signals based on novel time domain features for amputees' limb motion classification , 2017, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[12]  A.D.C. Chan,et al.  Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  Tom Chau,et al.  A self-contained, mechanomyography-driven externally powered prosthesis. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[15]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  Offline accuracy: A potentially misleading metric in myoelectric pattern recognition for prosthetic control , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  FMG-based body motion registration using piezoelectret sensors , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[18]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  P Madeleine,et al.  Mechanomyography and electromyography force relationships during concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Claudio Castellini,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Three Non-Invasive Human-Machine Interfaces for the Disabled , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[23]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  Lu Wang,et al.  Study on fatigue feature from forearm SEMG signal based on wavelet analysis , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[25]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  Towards reducing the impacts of unwanted movements on identification of motion intentions. , 2016, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[26]  Claudio Castellini,et al.  Assessment of a Wearable Force- and Electromyography Device and Comparison of the Related Signals for Myocontrol , 2016, Front. Neurorobot..

[27]  Dario Farina,et al.  Bayesian Filtering of Surface EMG for Accurate Simultaneous and Proportional Prosthetic Control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  J. Rafiee,et al.  Feature extraction of forearm EMG signals for prosthetics , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of the training set on the accuracy of surface EMG classification in dynamic contractions for the control of multifunction prostheses , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[31]  Claudio Castellini,et al.  A wearable low-cost device based upon Force-Sensing Resistors to detect single-finger forces , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[32]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Real time ECG artifact removal for myoelectric prosthesis control , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[33]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Evaluating EMG Feature and Classifier Selection for Application to Partial-Hand Prosthesis Control , 2016, Front. Neurorobot..

[34]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Teager–Kaiser Energy Operation of Surface EMG Improves Muscle Activity Onset Detection , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  Guy Cheron,et al.  Recognition of the physiological actions of the triphasic EMG pattern by a dynamic recurrent neural network , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  W. Craelius,et al.  Pressure signature of forearm as predictor of grip force. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[39]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effect of ECG Interference on Pattern-Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control for Targeted Muscle Reinnervated Patients , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  Blair A. Lock,et al.  Determining the Optimal Window Length for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control: Balancing the Competing Effects of Classification Error and Controller Delay , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[41]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  A motion-classification strategy based on sEMG-EEG signal combination for upper-limb amputees , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.