Uncertainty communication in the environmental life cycle assessment of carbon nanotubes.

Amidst the great technological progress being made in the field of nanotechnology, we are confronted by both conventional and novel environmental challenges and opportunities. Several gaps exist in the present state of knowledge or experience with nanomaterials. Understanding and managing the uncertainties that these gaps cause in LCAs is essential. Traditionally used for more established technology systems, environmental LCA is now being applied to nanomaterials by policy-makers, researchers and industry. However, the aleatory (variability) and epistemic (system process) uncertainties in LCAs of nanomaterials need to be handled correctly and communicated in the analysis. Otherwise, the results risk being misinterpreted, misguiding decision-making processes and could lead to significant detrimental effects for industry, research and policy-making. Here, we review current life cycle assessment literature for carbon nanotubes, and identify the key sources of uncertainty that need to be taken into consideration. These include: the potential for non-equivalency between mass and toxicity (potentially requiring inventory and impact models to be adjusted); the use of proxy data to bridge gaps in inventory data; and the often very wide ranges in material performance, process energy and product lifetimes quoted.

[1]  Jacqueline A. Isaacs,et al.  Environmental assessment of manufacturing with carbon nanotubes , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[2]  Vikas Khanna,et al.  Carbon Nanofiber Production , 2008 .

[3]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Identifying the largest environmental life cycle impacts during carbon nanotube synthesis via chemical vapour deposition , 2013 .

[4]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: state of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  T. Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2001 .

[6]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Towards prospective life cycle assessment: Single wall carbon nanotubes for lithium-ion batteries , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[7]  M. L. Healy,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Single‐Walled Carbon Nanotube Processes , 2008 .

[8]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Energy Requirements of Carbon Nanoparticle Production , 2008 .

[9]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment for Potential Continuous Processes for the Production of Carbon Nanotubes , 2008 .

[10]  Anthony G. Williams,et al.  Approaches for Addressing Life Cycle Assessment Data Gaps for Bio‐based Products , 2011 .

[11]  Witold-Roger Poganietz,et al.  Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology , 2008 .

[12]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. , 2010, Toxicology.

[14]  L.J. Lee,et al.  Assessing life cycle environmental implications of polymer nanocomposites , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment.

[15]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Potential release scenarios for carbon nanotubes used in composites. , 2013, Environment international.

[16]  Daniel J.C. Skinner,et al.  A review of uncertainty in environmental risk: characterising potential natures, locations and levels , 2014 .

[17]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Framework for LCI modelling of releases of manufactured nanomaterials along their life cycle , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Prospective Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Nanosilver T-Shirts , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  M. Huijbregts Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment , 2002 .

[20]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Life cycle assessment as a tool to enhance the environmental performance of carbon nanotube products: a review , 2012 .

[21]  M. Eckelman,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of a carbon nanotube-enabled semiconductor device. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits , 2009 .

[24]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Studying the potential release of carbon nanotubes throughout the application life cycle , 2008 .