Functional Outcomes of Nerve Root Sparing Posterior Corpectomy in Lumbar Vertebral Burst Fractures

Study Design: Retrospective observational. Objectives: This study aimed to document the safety and efficacy of lumbar corpectomy with reconstruction of anterior column through posterior-only approach in complete burst fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed complete lumbar burst fractures treated with corpectomy through posterior only approach between 2014 and 2018. Clinical and intraoperative data including pre and post-operative neurology as per the ISNCSCI grade, VAS score, operative time, blood loss and radiological parameters, including pre and post-surgery kyphosis, height loss and canal compromise was assessed. Results: A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 38.89 and a TLICS score 5 or more were analyzed. Preoperative VAS was 7-10. Mean operating time was 219.56 ± 30.15 minutes. Mean blood loss was 1280 ± 224.21 ml. 23 patients underwent short segment fixation and 22 underwent long segment fixation. There was no deterioration in post-operative neurological status in any patient. At follow-up, the VAS score was in the range of 1-3. The difference in preoperative kyphosis and immediate post-operative deformity correction, preoperative loss of height in vertebra and immediate post-operative correction in height were significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The posterior-only approach is safe, efficient, and provides rigid posterior stabilization, 360° neural decompression, and anterior reconstruction without the need for the anterior approach and its possible approach-related morbidity. We achieved good results with an all posterior approach in 45 patients of lumbar burst fracture (LBF) which is the largest series of this nature.

[1]  R. Rupp,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: impact of the revised worksheet (revision 02/13) on classification performance , 2016, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[2]  H. Boehm,et al.  Corpectomy of the Fifth Lumbar Vertebra, a Challenging Procedure , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[3]  Vero Vanden Abeele,et al.  Increasing the reliability and validity of quantitative laddering data with LadderUX , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[5]  H. Ghofrani,et al.  A retrospective review of long anterior fusions to the sacrum. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  Deng Shu-cai,et al.  Three-Column Reconstruction Through Single Posterior Approach for the Treatment of Unstable Thoracolumbar Fracture , 2010, Spine.

[7]  M. Sasani,et al.  Single-Stage Posterior Corpectomy and Expandable Cage Placement for Treatment of Thoracic or Lumbar Burst Fractures , 2009, Spine.

[8]  M. Ozveren,et al.  Three column stabilization through posterior approach alone: transpedicular placement of distractable cage with transpedicular screw fixation. , 2008, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[9]  J. Torner,et al.  Comparison of anterolateral and posterior approaches in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[10]  R. Bell,et al.  Single-Stage Treatment of Pyogenic Spinal Infection With Titanium Mesh Cages , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[11]  Moe R. Lim,et al.  Surgical Decision Making for Unstable Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries: Results of a Consensus Panel Review by the Spine Trauma Study Group , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[12]  N. Haas,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Expandable Cages for Vertebral Body Replacement in the Thoracolumbar Spine , 2004, Spine.

[13]  D. Gelb,et al.  Preliminary results of staged anterior debridement and reconstruction using titanium mesh cages in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  N. Haas,et al.  [Expandable cages: biomechanical comparison of different cages for ventral spondylodesis in the thoracolumbar spine]. , 2004, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[15]  C. Khodadadyan-Klostermann,et al.  Expandierbare Cages als Wirbelkörperersatz , 2004, Der Chirurg.

[16]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[17]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbosacral Reconstruction Techniques for Spondylolisthesis: An In Vitro Porcine Model , 2002, Spine.

[18]  R. Gaines,et al.  The Load Sharing Classification of Spine Fractures , 1994, Spine.

[19]  M. Jensen,et al.  Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients , 1993, Pain.

[20]  Kao-wha Chang A Reduction–Fixation System for Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures , 1992, Spine.

[21]  J. Kostuik,et al.  Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Burst Fractures , 1990, Spine.

[22]  M. Aebi,et al.  Stabilization of the Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spine with the Internal Spinal Skeletal Fixation System: Indications, Techniques, and First Results of Treatment , 1987, Spine.

[23]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. General principles and controversial considerations. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  F Denis,et al.  The Three Column Spine and Its Significance in the Classification of Acute Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries , 1983, Spine.

[25]  E. C. Huskisson,et al.  Graphic representation of pain , 1976, Pain.