Achieving IT‐based synergies through regulation‐oriented and consensus‐oriented IT governance capabilities

This study aims at exploring the IT governance capabilities that enable organizations to achieve IT‐based synergies. Following existing work on the contextualization of theories and drawing on the resource‐based view of the firm (RBV), we develop an RBV of IT‐based synergies in two steps. First, we adopt existing context‐specific constructs and relationships from prior work on IT governance capabilities, IT relatedness, and synergies to develop a preliminary contextualization of the RBV. Second, to further refine our theoretical framework, we conduct an exploratory field study that includes interviews with 26 CIOs and other IT executives from 21 multibusiness firms. Our findings suggest that IT governance capabilities lead to IT‐based synergies through IT relatedness and business process relatedness. We found regulation‐oriented IT governance capabilities (IT roles and IT processes) to increase IT relatedness, while consensus‐oriented IT governance capabilities (IT groups and relational capabilities) had a positive effect on business process relatedness. Our results suggest that, in isolation, IT and business process relatedness lead to IT cost synergies, while collectively enabling IT‐induced business synergies. Our study is among the first to treat IT relatedness as an endogenous construct and to explicitly integrate business process relatedness into the IT governance domain. Our context‐specific decomposition of IT governance capabilities helps to better explain their links to IT and business process relatedness. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the tension between IT‐based synergies and business‐IT alignment. Decision‐makers are guided in developing IT governance capabilities to achieve IT‐based synergies.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[2]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[3]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[4]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Aligning business and IT strategies in multi-business organizations , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[6]  Lutz Kolbe,et al.  IT Governance in a Network Context: Literature Review and Agenda for Research , 2013, AMCIS.

[7]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  Competing Perspectives on the Link Between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model , 2011, MIS Q..

[8]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[9]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[10]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Business value through controlled IT: toward an integrated model of IT governance success and its impact , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[19]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[20]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign , 2011 .

[21]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[22]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Looking Toward the Future of IT-Business Strategic Alignment through the Past: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, MIS Q..

[23]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Examining the Strategic Alignment and Implementation Success of a KMS: A Subculture-Based Multilevel Analysis , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[26]  ParéGuy,et al.  Toward a new theory of the contribution of the it function in organizations , 2012 .

[27]  J. Barney Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[28]  Paul P. Tallon A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[30]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Influencing the effectiveness of IT governance practices through steering committees and communication policies , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  IT-Enabled Business Capabilities for Turbulent Environments , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.

[32]  Randy V. Bradley,et al.  Enterprise architecture, IT effectiveness and the mediating role of IT alignment in US hospitals , 2012, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[34]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks , 2008, MIS Q..

[35]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[36]  Janek Richter,et al.  Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Gail Ridley,et al.  Attempting to Define IT Governance: Wisdom or Folly? , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[38]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[39]  Karl Manrodt,et al.  GLOBAL PROCESS STANDARDIZATION: A CASE STUDY , 2004 .

[40]  Kang Xie,et al.  Inter-firm IT governance in power-imbalanced buyer–supplier dyads: exploring how it works and why it lasts , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Carol V. Brown Horizontal Mechanisms Under Differing IS Organization Contexts , 1999, MIS Q..

[42]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[43]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[44]  Pontus Johnson,et al.  Defining IT governance - A consolidation of literature , 2005 .

[45]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Bridging the gap between the IS organization and the rest of the business: plotting a route , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[48]  Hiroyuki Itami Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[49]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Business Competence of Information Technology Professionals: Conceptual Development and Influence on IT-Business Partnerships , 2004, MIS Q..

[50]  Jens Dibbern,et al.  Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs Between Software Projects Offshored to India , 2008, MIS Q..

[51]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Role of IT executives in the firm's ability to achieve competitive advantage through IT capability , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[53]  Peter Weill,et al.  Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[54]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[55]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  EXPLORING CROSS-BUSINESS SYNERGIES. , 2001 .

[56]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[57]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  A mid-range theory of interfunctional integration, its antecedents and outcomes , 1993 .

[58]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[59]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  M. Jelinek Technology, Organizations, and Contingency , 1977 .

[61]  Paul Michelman,et al.  1 How to Develop a Great Digital Strategy , 2018 .

[62]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[63]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context , 2008, MIS Q..

[64]  Ryan Peterson,et al.  Crafting Information Technology Governance , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[65]  Guy Paré,et al.  Toward a New Theory of the Contribution of the IT Function in Organizations , 2012, MIS Q..

[66]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Information Technology Planning in the 1990's: Directions for Practice and Research , 1987, MIS Q..

[67]  L. Diamond IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[68]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Implementing Core IS Capabilities:: Feeny–Willcocks IT Governance and Management Framework Revisited , 2006 .

[69]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Integration Deficiencies in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Configurational Perspective , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[71]  R. Sanchez Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence , 2004 .

[72]  Dag H. Olsen,et al.  Educating reflective Enterprise Systems practitioners: a design research study of the iterative building of a teaching framework , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[73]  O. Holsti Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[74]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Cross-Functional Integration and New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of the Findings , 2008 .

[75]  Kai Wang,et al.  Business–IT fit in e‐procurement systems: evidence from high‐technology firms in China , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[76]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[77]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The information economy: A new perspective for effective information systems management , 1986, DATB.

[78]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Industry Boundaries: Human Expertise, Diversification and Resource-Related Industry Groups , 1994 .

[79]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers , 2015, MIS Q..

[80]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[81]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[82]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[83]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems , 2013, MIS Q..

[84]  Thomas Hess,et al.  How Chief Digital Officers Promote the Digital Transformation of their Companies , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.