Does ESG Crowd Out Support For Government Regulation?

[1]  Sverker C. Jagers,et al.  Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws , 2022, Nature Climate Change.

[2]  Robb Willer,et al.  Pragmatic bias impedes women’s access to political leadership , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  K. Wallston,et al.  Convincing conservatives: Private sector action can bolster support for climate change mitigation in the United States , 2021 .

[4]  D. S. Lund,et al.  The Corporate Governance Machine , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Roy Shapira Law and Reputation , 2020 .

[6]  Stephen M. Bainbridge Making Sense of The Business Roundtable’s Reversal on Corporate Purpose , 2020 .

[7]  E. Lambin,et al.  Scaling up Solutions for a Sustainability Transition , 2020 .

[8]  M. Wenzel,et al.  Against the odds: Hope as an antecedent of support for climate change action. , 2020, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  M. Gatti,et al.  Can a Broader Corporate Purpose Redress Inequality? The Stakeholder Approach Chimera , 2020 .

[10]  L. Bebchuk,et al.  The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance: Presentation Slides , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Stavros Gadinis,et al.  Corporate Law and Social Risk , 2020 .

[12]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Mediation analysis. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  David A. Dana,et al.  Regulation, Public Attitudes, and Private Governance , 2019, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.

[14]  Michael Tomz,et al.  Does Private Regulation Preempt Public Regulation? , 2018, American Political Science Review.

[15]  A. Bostrom,et al.  Efficacy, Action, and Support for Reducing Climate Change Risks , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  E. Posner,et al.  Norming in Administrative Law , 2018 .

[17]  Devin Caughey,et al.  Policy Preferences and Policy Change: Dynamic Responsiveness in the American States, 1936–2014 , 2017, American Political Science Review.

[18]  D. Cressey The bitter battle over the world’s most popular insecticides , 2017, Nature.

[19]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value , 2017 .

[20]  William H. J. Hubbard The Effects of Twombly and Iqbal , 2017 .

[21]  L. Strine Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence from My Hometown , 2017 .

[22]  J. C. van den Bergh,et al.  What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies , 2016 .

[23]  L. Strine The Dangers of Denial: The Need for a Clear-Eyed Understanding of the Power and Accountability Structure Established by the Delaware General Corporation Law , 2015 .

[24]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens , 2014, Perspectives on Politics.

[25]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .

[26]  Harper Ho,et al.  'Enlightened Shareholder Value': Corporate Governance Beyond the Shareholder-Stakeholder Divide , 2010 .

[27]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Corporate social responsibility, business strategy, and the environment , 2010 .

[28]  Simone de Colle,et al.  Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art , 2010 .

[29]  Joel Huber,et al.  Discontinuous Behavioral Responses to Recycling Laws and Plastic Water Bottle Deposits , 2009 .

[30]  Oren Perez,et al.  How Law Changes the Environmental Mind: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Legal Norms on Moral Perceptions and Civic Enforcement , 2009 .

[31]  B. Cashore,et al.  Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework , 2007 .

[32]  Tim Bartley,et al.  Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Gerard Llobet,et al.  Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Activism , 2007 .

[34]  D. Iacobucci,et al.  A Meditation on Mediation: Evidence that Structural Equations Models Perform Better than Regressions , 2007 .

[35]  David Vogel,et al.  The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct , 2006 .

[36]  David P. Baron,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[37]  Adam Winkler Corporate Law or the Law of Business? Stakeholders and Corporate Governance at the End of History , 2005 .

[38]  Kimberly A. Cameron,et al.  Strategies for Resisting Persuasion , 2003 .

[39]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  Quality leadership when regulatory standards are forthcoming , 2003 .

[40]  P. Burstein The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda , 2003 .

[41]  P. Newell Managing multinationals: the governance of investment for the environment , 2001 .

[42]  D. Schweikhardt,et al.  Politics by other Means: The Emergence of a New Politics of Food in the United States , 2001 .

[43]  David P. Baron,et al.  Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy , 2001 .

[44]  Vincenzo Denicolò,et al.  A Signalling Model of Environmental Overcompliance , 2000 .

[45]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Self‐Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism* , 2000, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[46]  A. Bandura Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[47]  Reinier Kraakman,et al.  The End of History for Corporate Law , 2000 .

[48]  Margaret M. Blair,et al.  A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law , 1999 .

[49]  R. Hoyle,et al.  Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: a conceptual overview. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[50]  Hajin Kim Expecting Corporate Prosociality , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[51]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The economic nature of the firm: Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure , 2009 .

[52]  M. Friedman The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[53]  C. Sunstein Montreal vs. Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols , 2006 .

[54]  Tim Bartley Corporate Accountability and the Privatization of Labor Standards: Struggles over Codes of Conduct in the Apparel Industry , 2005 .

[55]  Warren D. Smith Direct Democracy , 2002 .

[56]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[57]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  G. Charness,et al.  Experimental methods: Eliciting beliefs , 2021 .