Further insights into normal aortic valve function: role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area.

BACKGROUND This study aims to find the fundamental differences in the mechanism of opening and closing of a normal aortic valve and a valve with a stiff root, using a dynamic finite element model. METHODS A dynamic, finite element model with time varying pressure was used in this study. Shell elements with linear elastic properties for the leaflet and root were used. Two different cases were analyzed: (1) normal leaflets inside a compliant root, and (2) normal leaflets inside a stiff root. RESULTS A compliant aortic root contributes substantially to the smooth and symmetrical leaflet opening with minimal gradients. In contrast, the leaflet opening inside a stiff root is delayed, asymmetric, and wrinkled. However, this wrinkling is not associated with increased leaflet stresses. In compliant roots, the effective valve orifice area can substantially increase because of increased root pressure and transvalvular gradients. In stiff roots this effect is strikingly absent. CONCLUSIONS A compliant aortic root contributes substantially to smooth and symmetrical leaflet opening with minimal gradients. The compliance also contributes much to the ability of the normal aortic valve to increase its effective valve orifice in response to physiologic demands of exercise. This effect is strikingly absent in stiff roots.

[1]  J Shaheen,et al.  Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Komarakshi R Balakrishnan,et al.  Dynamic analysis of the aortic valve using a finite element model. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  Significant increase of aortic root volume and commissural area occurs prior to aortic valve opening. , 2000, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[4]  Francis Robicsek,et al.  Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaflet aortic valve: review of subject and presentation of a new theory. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  K. Watterson,et al.  Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaflet aortic valve. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  M. Thubrikar The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[7]  Gwm Gerrit Peters,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in the aortic heart valve , 2001 .

[8]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Role of sinus wall compliance in aortic leaflet function. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  M. Eriksson,et al.  Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Stress analysis of the aortic valve with and without the sinuses of valsalva. , 2001, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[11]  Y Imai,et al.  Regulation of the aortic valve opening. In vivo dynamic measurement of aortic valve orifice area. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  K S Kunzelman,et al.  Re-creation of sinuses is important for sparing the aortic valve: a finite element study. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  Richard P. Cochran,et al.  Finite-element analysis of aortic valve-sparing: influence of graft shape and stiffness , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R S Reneman,et al.  In vivo cinematographic analysis of behavior of the aortic valve. , 1981, The American journal of physiology.