Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection

We examined scalp-recorded event-related potentials following feedback stimuli in a time-estimation task. Six hundred msec after indicating the end of a 1 sec interval, subjects received a visual, auditory, or somatosensory stimulus that indicated whether the interval they had produced was correct. Following feedback indicating incorrect performance, a negative deflection occurred, whose characteristics corresponded closely to those of the component (the error-related negativity) that accompanies errors in choice reaction time tasks. Furthermore, equivalent dipole analysis suggested that, for all three modalities, the distribution of the scalp potential was consistent with a local source in the anterior cingulate cortex or a more distributed source in the supplementary motor areas. These loci correspond closely to those described previously for the error-related negativity. We conclude that the error-related negativity is the manifestation of the activity of a generic neural system involved in error detection.

[1]  P. Rabbitt Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  E Donchin,et al.  On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG--a biophysical approach to the EOG. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  P. Venables For Distinguished Contributions to Psychophysiology , 1988 .

[7]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[8]  T. Elbert,et al.  Can subcortical structures generate potentials large in amplitude , 1990 .

[9]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[11]  T. Treasure Where did I go wrong? , 1994, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Coles,et al.  "Where did I go wrong?" A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  M G Coles,et al.  A brain potential manifestation of error-related processing. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[14]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[15]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. , 1995 .

[16]  E. Donchin,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and error-related processing: an analysis of incorrect responses to go and no-go stimuli. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.