Integrated natural resource management as pathway to poverty reduction: Innovating practices, institutions and policies

Abstract Poverty has many faces and poverty reduction many pathways in different contexts. Lack of food and income interact with lack of access to water, energy, protection from floods, voice, rights and recognition. Among the pathways by which agricultural research can increase rural prosperity, integrated natural resource management deals with a complex nexus of issues, with tradeoffs among issues that are in various stages of denial, recognition, analysis, innovation, scenario synthesis and creation of platforms for (policy) change. Rather than on a portfolio of externally developed ‘solutions’ ready for adoption and use, the concept of sustainable development may primarily hinge on the strengths and weaknesses of local communities to observe, analyse, innovate, connect, organize collective action and become part of wider coalitions. ‘Boundary work’ supporting such efforts can help resolve issues in a polycentric governance context, especially where incomplete understanding and knowledge prevent potential win-win alternatives to current lose-lose conflicts to emerge. Integrated research-development approaches deal with context (‘theory of place’) and options (‘theory of change’) in multiple ways that vary from selecting sites for studying pre-defined issues to starting from whatever issue deserves prominence in a given location of interest. A knowledge-to-action linkage typology recognizes three situations of increasing complexity. In Type I more knowledge can directly lead to action by a single decision maker; in Type II more knowledge can inform tradeoff decisions, while in Type III negotiation support of multiple knowledge + multiple decision maker settings deals with a higher level of complexity. Current impact quantification can deal with the first, is challenged in the second and inadequate in the third case, dealing with complex social-ecological systems. Impact-oriented funding may focus on Type I and miss the opportunities for the larger ultimate impact of Type II and III involvements.

[1]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia , 2015 .

[2]  S. Lane,et al.  Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method , 2011 .

[3]  E. Corbera.  Valuing nature, paying for ecosystem services and realizing social justice: A response to Matulis (2014) , 2015 .

[4]  P. Glasbergen,et al.  On The Profitability of Sustainability Certification: An Analysis among Indonesian Palm Oil Smallholders , 2016 .

[5]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: Are we asking the right questions? , 2004 .

[6]  G. Villamor,et al.  Payments for Environmental Services: Evolution Toward Efficient and Fair Incentives for Multifunctional Landscapes , 2012 .

[7]  Fergus L. Sinclair,et al.  Scaling up agroforestry requires research ‘in’ rather than ‘for’ development , 2014 .

[8]  Paolo Omar Cerutti,et al.  Certify and shift blame, or resolve issues? Environmentally and socially responsible global trade and production of timber and tree crops , 2017 .

[9]  K. Giller,et al.  When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture , 2013 .

[10]  F. Mauro,et al.  TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF INDIGENOUS AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES: INTERNATIONAL DEBATE AND POLICY INITIATIVES , 2000 .

[11]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Trees, forests and water : Cool insights for a hot world , 2017 .

[12]  K. King,et al.  The wasted lands: the programme of work of ICRAF , 1978 .

[13]  Keith D. Shepherd,et al.  Land health surveillance and response: A framework for evidence-informed land management , 2015 .

[14]  C. Fay,et al.  Strengthening forest management in Indonesia through land tenure reform : issues and framework for action , 2005 .

[15]  G. Villamor,et al.  Agroforestry for landscape restoration and livelihood development in Central Asia. , 2015 .

[16]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Boundary work: Knowledge co-production for negotiating payment for watershed services in Indonesia , 2015 .

[17]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Co-investment in ecosystem services: global lessons from payment and incentive schemes , 2018 .

[18]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Flood risk reduction and flow buffering as ecosystem services – Part 1: Theory on flow persistence, flashiness and base flow , 2017 .

[19]  Luis Roman Carrasco,et al.  How auctions to allocate Payments for Ecosystem Services contracts impact social equity. , 2017 .

[20]  G. Lacombe,et al.  Integrated systems research for sustainable smallholder agriculture in the Central Mekong: Achievements and challenges of implementing integrated systems research , 2016 .

[21]  Seline S. Meijer,et al.  The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa , 2015 .

[22]  Carl D. Shapiro,et al.  From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments , 2017 .

[23]  Dana D Miller,et al.  Zero Deforestation Zones: The Case for Linking Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives and Jurisdictional REDD+ , 2015 .

[24]  G. Villamor,et al.  Stewardship Agreement to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD): Case Study from Lubuk Beringin's Hutan Desa, Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia , 2010 .

[25]  G. Villamor,et al.  Tree cover transitions and food security in Southeast Asia , 2014 .

[26]  B. Leimona,et al.  Poverty and Environmental Services: Case Study in Way Besai Watershed, Lampung Province, Indonesia , 2007 .

[27]  S. Wilson,et al.  Governing restoration: Strategies, adaptations and innovations for tomorrow’s forest landscapes , 2016 .

[28]  F. Sinclair,et al.  Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2016 .

[29]  C. T. de Wit,et al.  Resource use efficiency in agriculture , 1992 .

[30]  Trong Hoan Do,et al.  REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration , 2014 .

[31]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Multipurpose agroforestry as a climate change resiliency option for farmers: an example of local adaptation in Vietnam , 2013, Climatic Change.

[32]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Co-investment paradigms as alternatives to payments for tree-based ecosystem services in Africa , 2014 .

[33]  J. Tinbergen.  On the Theory of Economic Policy , 1954 .

[34]  C. Mbow,et al.  Can agroforestry option values improve the functioning of drivers of agricultural intensification in Africa , 2014 .

[35]  V. Robiglio,et al.  Restoration through formalization? Assessing the potential of Peru’s Agroforestry Concessions scheme to contribute to restoration in agricultural frontiers in the Amazon region , 2016 .

[36]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes , 2007 .

[37]  Grace B. Villamor,et al.  Gender specific land-use decisions and implications for ecosystem services in semi-matrilineal Sumatra , 2016 .

[38]  T. Sunderland,et al.  Dietary Quality and Tree Cover in Africa , 2013 .

[39]  D. Murdiyarso,et al.  Policy analysis and environmental problems at different scales: asking the right questions , 2004 .

[40]  L. Verchot,et al.  Mud, muddle and models in the knowledge value-chain to action on tropical peatland conservation , 2014, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[41]  R. Prabhu,et al.  Universitet Agroforestry : Realising the promise of an agroecological approach , 2015 .

[42]  Douglas H. Wrenn,et al.  Invisible water, visible impact: groundwater use and Indian agriculture under climate change , 2016 .

[43]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia , 2009 .

[45]  Robert Shupp,et al.  Social Norms, Behavioral Payment Programs, and Cooperative Behaviors: Toward a Theory of Financial Incentives in Normative Systems , 2017 .

[46]  D. L. M. Vieira,et al.  RESTORATION THROUGH AGROFORESTRY: OPTIONS FOR RECONCILING LIVELIHOODS WITH CONSERVATION IN THE CERRADO AND CAATINGA BIOMES IN BRAZIL , 2017, Experimental Agriculture.

[47]  F. Agus,et al.  Reducing emissions from land use in Indonesia: motivation, policy instruments and expected funding streams , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[48]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Social-ecological and regional adaptation of agrobiodiversity management across a global set of research regions , 2012 .

[49]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective , 2008 .

[50]  M. Marmot,et al.  Evidence based policy or policy based evidence? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[51]  A. Izac,et al.  Towards a natural resource management paradigm for international agriculture: the example of agroforestry research , 2001 .

[52]  Samantha H. Cheng,et al.  What is the evidence for the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation? A systematic map protocol , 2017, Environmental Evidence.

[53]  P. Beckschäfer,et al.  China's fight to halt tree cover loss , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Jake L. Snaddon,et al.  Biodiversity and agricultural sustainagility: from assessment to adaptive management , 2010 .

[55]  Auction winning, social dynamics and non-compliance in a payment for ecosystem services scheme in Indonesia , 2017 .

[56]  G. Villamor,et al.  Social Role-Play Games Vs Individual Perceptions of Conservation and PES Agreements for Maintaining Rubber Agroforests in Jambi (Sumatra), Indonesia , 2011 .

[57]  Laura German,et al.  A methodology for tracking the “fate” of technological interventions in agriculture , 2006 .

[58]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Global change and multi-species agroecosystems : Concepts and issues , 1998 .

[59]  K. Cassman,et al.  Agricultural innovation to protect the environment , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Can intensification reduce emission intensity of biofuel through optimized fertilizer use? Theory and the case of oil palm in Indonesia , 2017 .

[61]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world , 2014 .

[62]  H. Laudon,et al.  Intermediate tree cover can maximize groundwater recharge in the seasonally dry tropics , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[63]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Hot Spots of Confusion: Contested Policies and Competing Carbon Claims in the Peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2011 .

[65]  D. Catacutan,et al.  Pricing rainbow, green, blue and grey water: tree cover and geopolitics of climatic teleconnections , 2014 .

[66]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Central hypotheses for the third agroforestry paradigm within a common definition. , 2016 .

[67]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  If we cannot define it, we cannot save it: forest definitions and REDD. , 2009 .

[68]  Widianto,et al.  Factors affecting soil loss at plot scale and sediment yield at catchment scale in a tropical volcanic agroforestry landscape. , 2010 .

[69]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Flood risk reduction and flow buffering as ecosystem services – Part 2: Land use and rainfall intensity effects in Southeast Asia , 2017 .

[70]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments , 2006, PLoS biology.

[71]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  Selection of Native Tree Species for Subtropical Forest Restoration in Southwest China , 2017, PloS one.

[72]  B. Campbell,et al.  The Science of Sustainable Development: Local Livelihoods and the Global Environment , 2003 .

[73]  F. Sinclair,et al.  Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire value integrating tree diversity in cocoa for the provision of ecosystem services , 2014, Agroforestry Systems.

[74]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services , 2013 .

[75]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Migrants, land markets and carbon emissions in Jambi, Indonesia: Land tenure change and the prospect of emission reduction , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[76]  Boru Douthwaite,et al.  Towards a complexity-aware theory of change for participatory research programs working within agricultural innovation systems , 2017 .

[77]  P. Levang,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Do we need new management paradigms to achieve sustainability in tropical forests? Domestic Forests: A New Paradigm for Integrating Local Communities' Forestry into Tropical Forest Science , 2007 .

[78]  M. Wells,et al.  Integrating Protected Area Management with Local Needs and Aspirations , 2004, Ambio.

[79]  D. Garrity,et al.  Evergreen Agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa , 2010, Food Security.

[80]  Jean-Christophe Castella,et al.  Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam , 2007 .

[81]  Lalisa A. Duguma,et al.  Landscape restoration from a social- ecological system perspective? , 2015 .

[82]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach , 2017 .

[83]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Farmer portfolios, strategic diversity management and climate-change adaptation – implications for policy in Vietnam and Kenya , 2014 .

[84]  F. Bongers,et al.  The frankincense tree Boswellia neglecta reveals high potential for restoration of woodlands in the Horn of Africa , 2017 .

[85]  P. Chirwa,et al.  Overview of restoration and management practices in the degraded landscapes of the Sahelian and dryland forests and woodlands of East and southern Africa§ , 2017 .

[86]  G. Michon,et al.  REDRESSING FORESTRY HEGEMONY WHEN A FORESTRY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IS BEST REPLACED BY AN AGRARIAN ONE , 2005 .

[87]  J. Anderies,et al.  Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[88]  P. Koohafkan,et al.  Forgotten Agricultural Heritage: Reconnecting food systems and sustainable development , 2016 .

[89]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: Leveraging multiple paradigms at the tropical forest margins , 2013 .

[90]  G. Mace,et al.  Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A review of the empirical links , 2015 .

[91]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Towards Solutions for State vs. Local Community Conflicts Over Forestland: The Impact of Formal Recognition of User Rights in Krui, Sumatra, Indonesia , 2007 .

[92]  N. Burgess,et al.  Towards operational payments for water ecosystem services in Tanzania: a case study from the Uluguru Mountains , 2012, Oryx.

[93]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  From euphoria to reality on efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) , 2014, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[94]  D. Stern.  The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2004 .

[95]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Protected areas within multifunctional landscapes: squeezing out intermediate land use intensities in the tropics? , 2013 .

[96]  Tonya Schuetz,et al.  Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based , 2017 .

[97]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Compensation and Reward for Environmental Services in the Tropics Principles for Fairness and Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Services in Asia: Payments, Compensation, or Co-Investment? , 2010 .

[98]  P. Sabatier.  Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change , 1987 .

[99]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: Institutional, financial, legal and science‐policy challenges and solutions , 2011 .

[100]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services in the Developing World: Framing Pan-Tropical Analysis and Comparison , 2009 .

[101]  Pete Smith,et al.  The Tropical Peatland Plantation-Carbon Assessment Tool: estimating CO2 emissions from tropical peat soils under plantations , 2014, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[102]  Andrew J. Dougill,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Anticipating Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Pastoral Systems: Using Dynamic Systems Models for the Kalahari , 2010 .

[103]  H. Neufeldt,et al.  How trees and people can co- adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes , 2011 .

[104]  W. Clark,et al.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  F. Sinclair,et al.  Illusions of empowerment? Questioning policy and practice of community forestry in Kenya , 2015 .

[106]  Robert Chambers,et al.  Crying Out for Change: Voices of the Poor , 2000 .

[107]  D. Garrity,et al.  The contribution of agroforestry systems to reducing farmers' dependence on the resources of adjacent national parks: a case study from Sumatra, Indonesia , 2001, Agroforestry Systems.

[108]  W. Knudson.  The Environment, Energy, and the Tinbergen Rule , 2009 .

[109]  K. Shepherd,et al.  The rooted pedon in a dynamic multifunctional landscape: Soil science at the World Agroforestry Centre , 2015 .

[110]  Beria Leimona,et al.  Discourses on the performance gap of agriculture in a green economy: a Q-methodology study in Indonesia , 2017 .

[111]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Indonesia’s forest conversion moratorium assessed with an agent-based model of Land-Use Change and Ecosystem Services (LUCES) , 2016, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[112]  Jean-Christophe Castella,et al.  Effects of Landscape Segregation on Livelihood Vulnerability: Moving From Extensive Shifting Cultivation to Rotational Agriculture and Natural Forests in Northern Laos , 2013 .

[113]  Carol J. Pierce Colfer,et al.  The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Collaborative Management , 2005 .

[114]  Umit Bulut,et al.  The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach , 2016 .

[115]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis' , 2002 .

[116]  Lawrence A Fisher,et al.  Metrics of water security, adaptive capacity, and agroforestry in Indonesia , 2016 .

[117]  E. Luedeling,et al.  Constraints and opportunities for tree diversity management along the forest transition curve to achieve multifunctional agriculture , 2014 .

[118]  J. Barlow,et al.  Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future , 2016, Global change biology.

[119]  N. Braathen.  Instrument Mixes for Environmental Policy: How Many Stones Should be Used to Kill a Bird? , 2007 .

[120]  Un Desa.  Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[121]  Antonio Trabucco,et al.  Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[122]  S. Ogle,et al.  Management swing potential for bioenergy crops , 2013 .

[123]  Vincent Gitz,et al.  Tropical forest-transition landscapes: a portfolio for studying people, tree crops and agro-ecological change in context , 2017 .

[124]  D. Lister-Sharp,et al.  Longer-term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: a systematic review. , 2003, Addiction.

[125]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Negotiation Support Models for Integrated Natural Resource Management in Tropical Forest Margins , 2002 .

[126]  Francisco Alvarez-Cuadrado,et al.  Structural Change Out of Agriculture: Labor Push Versus Labor Pull , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.