Association of Time Between Left Ventricular and Aortic Systolic Pressure Peaks With Severity of Aortic Stenosis and Calcification of Aortic Valve.

Importance Diagnosis of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging. We hypothesized that the time between left ventricular (LV) and aortic systolic pressure peaks (TLV-Ao) is associated with aortic stenosis (AS) severity and may have additive value in diagnosing severe AS, especially in patients with low-gradient AS. Objective To investigate the diagnostic utility of measuring catheter-based TLV-Ao in patients with severe AS. Design, Setting, and Participants We studied 123 patients with severe AS at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, a tertiary referral center, who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via femoral access and had pre-TAVR cardiac computed tomography assessment and hemodynamic measurements recorded during a TAVR procedure. All patients received hemodynamic evaluation, echocardiographic assessment, and quantification of aortic valve calcification (AVC) by multidetector computed tomography. Hemodynamic data were collected via left heart catheterization done just before TAVR, and TLV-Ao was calculated offline. Data were analyzed between October 5, 2015, and July 20, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures The association between TLV-Ao and AVC or other conventional imaging parameters was analyzed. Results Of the included patients, the mean (SD) age was 81 (9) years, and 65 (54%) were men (54%). Among 123 patients, 48 patients (39%) had low-gradient AS (<40 mm Hg) and mean (SD) TLV-Ao was 69 (39) milliseconds. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, higher TLV-Ao (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P = .002) and higher peak aortic valve (AV) velocity (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .008) were independently associated with severe AVC (AVC >1000 AU). Adding TLV-Ao to the peak AV velocity and AV area showed significant incremental value to be associated with AVC, with a net reclassification improvement of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.23-0.99; P = .002) and integrated discriminatory improvement of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.03-0.16; P = .003). In a subgroup of patients with low-grade AS, higher TLV-Ao was the only parameter associated with severe AVC (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.001-1.04; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Prolonged TLV-Ao was associated with severe AVC. This catheter-based hemodynamic index may be an additional surrogate to differentiate low-gradient true severe AS. Larger, prospective studies investigating the role of TLV-Ao as a marker of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR are required.

[1]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  Sergio Gamaza-Chulián,et al.  Acceleration Time and Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time in Aortic Stenosis: New Echocardiographic Diagnostic Parameters , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  Andrew J Einstein,et al.  Practical determination of aortic valve calcium volume score on contrast-enhanced computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement and impact on paravalvular regurgitation: Elucidating optimal threshold cutoffs. , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[4]  J. Chambers,et al.  Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  B. Chow,et al.  Quantifying Aortic Valve Calcification using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  Michael E. Hall,et al.  Delayed Time to Peak Velocity Is Useful for Detecting Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[7]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography‐based values in aortic stenosis , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Nancy M Albert,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  P. Schoenhagen,et al.  Significance of Aortic Valve Calcification in Patients With Low‐Gradient Low‐Flow Aortic Stenosis , 2014, Clinical cardiology.

[11]  P. Pibarot,et al.  The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  W. Zoghbi,et al.  Flow acceleration time and ratio of acceleration time to ejection time for prosthetic aortic valve function. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Yurii S. Aulchenko,et al.  PredictABEL: an R package for the assessment of risk prediction models , 2011, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[14]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Blacher,et al.  Statins, central blood pressure, and blood pressure amplification. , 2009, Circulation.

[17]  Yujie Zhou,et al.  Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  J. Greenfield,et al.  Left Ventricular Ejection Time in Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 1973, Circulation.

[20]  J. Voigt,et al.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[21]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  ACCF/AHA TASK FORCE MEMBERS , 2013 .