Comparison of the Lumped and Quasi-distributed Clark Runoff Models in Simulating Flood Hydrographs on a Semi-arid Watershed

In applied hydrology, predicting peak flow for a stream or river is so complex due to temporal and spatial dependency of hydrological variables such as meteorological parameters, variations in soil type and land use. Either advanced distributed hydrological models or simple Lump models can be used for simulating these situations. This paper compares the performance of the quasi-distributed model ModClark versus lumped parameter model Clark in simulating the process of transformation of rainfall to runoff. The aim of this comparison is to identify whether using a complex model which takes into account spatial and temporal distribution parameters, which are hard to prepare and use, will lead to more precise results or not. For the purpose of this study, historical data of Randan basin situated in semi-arid region of Iran in North West of Tehran was used. The size of the catchment is 67.76 km2. Reviewing the results of calibration and accuracy of models revealed that both models are able to simulate the hydrology of the catchment in an acceptable way.

[1]  David R. Maidment,et al.  GIS and Distributed Watershed Models. I: Data Coverages and Sources , 2001 .

[2]  Emad Habib,et al.  Sensitivity of Conceptual and Physically Based Hydrologic Models to Temporal and Spatial Rainfall Sampling , 2009 .

[3]  V. Ponce.  Engineering Hydrology: Principles and Practices , 1989 .

[4]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[5]  J. C. Peters,et al.  Runoff simulation using radar rainfall data , 1996 .

[6]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments , 1985 .

[7]  C. O. Clark.  Storage and the Unit Hydrograph , 1945 .

[8]  Murari Paudel,et al.  Comparison of Lumped and Quasi-Distributed Clark Runoff Models Using the SCS Curve Number Equation , 2009 .

[9]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  From lumped to distributed via semi-distributed: Calibration strategies for semi-distributed hydrologic models , 2012 .

[10]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[11]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Modelling the hydrology of a catchment using a distributed and a semi‐distributed model , 2005 .

[12]  A. Sarangi,et al.  Comparison of spatial variability techniques for runoff estimation from a canadian watershed , 2006 .

[13]  Jurgen D. Garbrecht,et al.  GIS and Distributed Watershed Models II , 2001 .

[14]  Edmond F. Schulz.  Problems in applied hydrology , 1974 .

[15]  Lindell Ormsbee,et al.  A comparison of two hydrologic models for steeply sloping forested watersheds , 1989 .

[16]  R. McCuen.  Hydrologic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[17]  A. Feldman,et al.  Evolution of Clark's Unit Graph Method to Spatially Distributed Runoff , 1998 .

[18]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system , 2004, Journal of Hydrology.

[19]  Jurgen D. Garbrecht,et al.  GIS and Distributed Watershed Models. II: Modules, Interfaces, and Models , 2001 .