Patient Perception, Preference and Participation Patient preferences and performance bias in a weight loss trial with a usual care arm §,§§

1. IntroductionPerformance bias refers to the conduct of a trial inadvertentlyintroducing differences between randomized groups other thanthe intervention(s) being evaluated. Such departures fromintended study design may compromise study aims by under-mining capacity to make valid inferences about interventioneffects. In healthcare contexts, staff provision of differential carewhen there is a lack of blinding about randomization statusconstitutes a classic example of this phenomenon. Indeeddifferential care has been included within the definition offeredby the Cochrane Collaboration as ‘‘systematic differences betweengroups in the care that is provided, or in exposure to factors otherthan the interventions of interest’’ [1]. Whilst considered in thecontext of systematic reviews [e.g. [2]] and related researchmethods texts, it is not obvious that this construct has itself beensubjected to empirical research scrutiny.Randomization is a somewhat unusual process as chance doesnot overtly govern many decisions in people’s lives, and this mayprovoke apprehension in advance or result in disappointment forsome trial participants [3]. Randomization is important in healthsciences and is widely used for good reasons, though paradoxicallyitsdirecteffectsarerarelymeasured[4].Placebocontrolconditionsare used in trials to manage the possible effects of disappointment,as well as to take account of the placebo effect itself [5]. Due toconcerns such as these, patient preference designs have beendevelopedtoavoidrandomizingparticipantswithstrongallocationpreferences to study conditions that would be disappointing [6].Some systematic reviews have identified capacity of preferences toimpact on trial outcomes [7] whereas others have not [8].Zelen designs have also been developed for situations whereseeking consent to be randomized may be problematic [9].Systematic reviews provide evidence of the use of Zelen andpatient

[1]  D. Elbourne,et al.  In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trials☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  Jim McCambridge,et al.  The Effects of Demand Characteristics on Research Participant Behaviours in Non-Laboratory Settings: A Systematic Review , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  M. Kenward,et al.  A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care of the Camden Weight Loss (CAMWEL) programme , 2012, BMJ Open.

[4]  Diana Elbourne,et al.  Can Research Assessments Themselves Cause Bias in Behaviour Change Trials? A Systematic Review of Evidence from Solomon 4-Group Studies , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Effects of Study Design and Allocation on participant behaviour - ESDA: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2011, Trials.

[8]  A. Edwards,et al.  Preventing disease through opportunistic, rapid engagement by primary care teams using behaviour change counselling (PRE-EMPT): protocol for a general practice-based cluster randomised trial , 2010, BMC family practice.

[9]  S. Sutton,et al.  Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: how much of a problem is it? What can be done about it? , 2010, British journal of health psychology.

[10]  B. Colagiuri Participant expectancies in double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials: potential limitations to trial validity , 2010, Clinical trials.

[11]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self , 2010, Trials.

[12]  J. Howick Questioning the Methodologic Superiority of ‘Placebo’ Over ‘Active’ Controlled Trials , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[13]  F. Hamdy,et al.  It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[14]  A. Jacoby,et al.  Duty, desire or indifference? A qualitative study of patient decisions about recruitment to an epilepsy treatment trial , 2006, Trials.

[15]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Review of randomised trials using the post-randomised consent (Zelen's) design. , 2006, Contemporary clinical trials.

[16]  Elizabeth Allen,et al.  Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  P. Bower,et al.  Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[18]  S. Edwards,et al.  Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[19]  E. Robinson,et al.  The impact of describing clinical trial treatments as new or standard. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  E. Robinson,et al.  Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[21]  Jenny L Donovan,et al.  "Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[22]  I. Chalmers Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experiments. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  P. Munkholm,et al.  Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non-cancer trials. , 2000 .

[24]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[25]  M Zelen,et al.  Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an update. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  C. Brewin,et al.  Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. , 1989, BMJ.

[27]  S. Pocock,et al.  Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1984 .

[28]  T. Peters,et al.  Development of a complex intervention improved randomization and informed consent in a randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .