Venue-author-coupling: A measure for identifying disciplines through author communities

Conceptualizations of disciplinarity often focus on the social aspects of disciplines; that is, disciplines are defined by the set of individuals who participate in their activities and communications. However, operationalizations of disciplinarity often demarcate the boundaries of disciplines by standard classification schemes, which may be inflexible to changes in the participation profile of that discipline. To address this limitation, a metric called venue-author-coupling VAC is proposed and illustrated using journals from the Journal Citation Report's JCR library science and information science category. As JCRs are some of the most frequently used categories in bibliometric analyses, this allows for an examination of the extent to which the journals in JCR categories can be considered as proxies for disciplines. By extending the idea of bibliographic coupling, VAC identifies similarities among journals based on the similarities of their author profiles. The employment of this method using information science and library science journals provides evidence of four distinct subfields, that is, management information systems, specialized information and library science, library science-focused, and information science-focused research. The proposed VAC method provides a novel way to examine disciplinarity from the perspective of author communities.

[1]  Andrew Abbott.  Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred , 1999 .

[2]  Lisa R. Lattuca.  Learning Interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural Perspectives on Academic Work , 2002 .

[3]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[4]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared impact of LIS/MIS fields , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Howard D. White,et al.  Authors as markers of Intellectual Space: Co‐citation in studies of Science, Technology and Society , 1982, J. Documentation.

[10]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Francisco J. Acedo,et al.  Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Ying Ding,et al.  Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information , 2010, ASIST.

[13]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton's Cosine versus the Jaccard index , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras,et al.  A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: the SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995 , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Chapter 4. Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: Knowledge Cultures and Epistemic Cultures , 2007 .

[17]  Fredrik Åström.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004 , 2007 .

[18]  Howard D. White,et al.  Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  ÅströmFredrik.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 19902004 , 2007 .

[20]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Why Words and Co-Words Cannot Map the Development of the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[22]  K. K. Cetina.  Culture in global knowledge societies: knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures , 2007 .

[23]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Howard D. White,et al.  Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Olle Persson,et al.  The Intellectual Base and Research Fronts of JASIS 1986-1990 , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[27]  M. D. Beecher.  Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  van Eck Nees Jan,et al.  How to normalize cooccurrence data An analysis of some well-known similarity measures , 2009 .

[29]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  R. Valenza.  Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, 1680–1820: Physics and its Audiences , 2009 .

[31]  Nees Jan van Eck,et al.  How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[33]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Author bibliographic coupling: Another approach to citation-based author knowledge network analysis , 2008, ASIST.

[34]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  The Visibility of Information Science and Library Science Research in Bibliometric Mapping of the LIS Field , 2010, The Library Quarterly.

[35]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[36]  Michael E. D. Koenig,et al.  Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method , 1977, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  M. Callon,et al.  From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis , 1983 .

[38]  C. Borgman,et al.  Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. , 1992 .

[39]  David Minguillo,et al.  Toward a new way of mapping scientific fields: Authors' competence for publishing in scholarly journals , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  M. M. Kessler.  Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .

[41]  O. Persson.  The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990 , 1994 .

[42]  R. Valenza.  Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, 1680–1820: The Economies of Knowledge , 2009 .

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies , 1989, Scientometrics.