Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction to identify a sensitive subpopulation using a continuous biomarker in a randomized phase 2 trial

With the development of molecular targeted drugs, predictive biomarkers have played an increasingly important role in identifying patients who are likely to receive clinically meaningful benefits from experimental drugs (i.e., sensitive subpopulation) even in early clinical trials. For continuous biomarkers, such as mRNA levels, it is challenging to determine cutoff value for the sensitive subpopulation, and widely accepted study designs and statistical approaches are not currently available. In this paper, we propose the Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction (BAPER) approach to identify the sensitive subpopulation while restricting enrollment of patients from the insensitive subpopulation based on the results of interim analyses, in a randomized phase 2 trial with time-to-endpoint outcome and a single biomarker. Applying a four-parameter change-point model to the relationship between the biomarker and hazard ratio, we calculate the posterior distribution of the cutoff value that exhibits the target hazard ratio and use it for the restriction of the enrollment and the identification of the sensitive subpopulation. We also consider interim monitoring rules for termination because of futility or efficacy. Extensive simulations demonstrated that our proposed approach reduced the number of enrolled patients from the insensitive subpopulation, relative to an approach with no enrollment restriction, without reducing the likelihood of a correct decision for next trial (no-go, go with entire population, or go with sensitive subpopulation) or correct identification of the sensitive subpopulation. Additionally, the four-parameter change-point model had a better performance over a wide range of simulation scenarios than a commonly used dichotomization approach. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Kolesar,et al.  A Bayesian adaptive design with biomarkers for targeted therapies , 2010, Clinical trials.

[2]  B. Freidlin,et al.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials , 2014, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[3]  A Likelihood and Resampling Based Approach to Dichotomizing a Continuous Biomarker in Medical Research , 2013, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Decision Rules for Subgroup Selection Based on a Predictive Biomarker , 2014, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[7]  R. Simon,et al.  Design and analysis of clinical trials for predictive medicine , 2015 .

[8]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Lanju Zhang,et al.  Enrichment design with patient population augmentation. , 2015, Contemporary clinical trials.

[10]  Boris Freidlin,et al.  Randomized phase II trial designs with biomarkers. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  James X. Song A two-stage patient enrichment adaptive design in phase II oncology trials. , 2014, Contemporary clinical trials.

[12]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset , 2007, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[13]  C. Jennison,et al.  An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints † , 2011, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[14]  Ziding Feng,et al.  Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous Marker , 2007, Biometrics.

[15]  N. Simon,et al.  Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials. , 2013, Biostatistics.

[16]  C. Craddock,et al.  Stratified medicine in European Medicines Agency licensing: a systematic review of predictive biomarkers , 2014, BMJ Open.

[17]  Joseph G. Ibrahim,et al.  Bayesian Survival Analysis , 2004 .

[18]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Clinical Translation and Validation of a Predictive Biomarker for Patritumab, an Anti-human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3 (HER3) Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2015, EBioMedicine.

[19]  C. Schumann,et al.  Phase 2 HERALD study of patritumab (P) with erlotinib (E) in advanced NSCLC subjects (SBJs). , 2014 .

[20]  Tai-Tsang Chen Statistical issues and challenges in immuno-oncology , 2013, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[21]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Integrating biomarkers in clinical trials , 2011, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[22]  D. Sargent,et al.  Adaptive randomized phase II design for biomarker threshold selection and independent evaluation. , 2014, Chinese clinical oncology.

[23]  R. Simon Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms , 2010, Clinical trials.

[24]  Joseph G. Ibrahim,et al.  A Bayesian justification of Cox's partial likelihood , 2003 .

[25]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[27]  R. Simon,et al.  Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  J Jack Lee,et al.  Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development , 2008, Clinical trials.

[29]  A two‐stage Bayesian design for co‐development of new drugs and companion diagnostics , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  S. Morita,et al.  Biomarker‐based Bayesian randomized phase II clinical trial design to identify a sensitive patient subpopulation , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  Lyndsay N Harris,et al.  Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.