Risk factors of recurrent carotid blowout syndrome and strategy of endovascular management

Background: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a catastrophic complication after aggressive head and neck cancer treatment. Endovascular embolization is an effective modality to manage CBS. However, some CBS may have recurrent CBS (rCBS) after endovascular management. This study aims to report the potential rCBS risk and endovascular management strategy. Methods: Of the 225 patients with CBS referred for embolization in 13 years, 31 men and one woman (mean age, 55 years) with 35 rCBS with pseudoaneurysms formation were identified after endovascular management. Moreover, the rCBS preembolization angioarchitecture, rCBS cause, rCBS time interval, embolic materials selection, and final embolization clinical/angiographic outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: rCBS with pseudoaneurysm due to disease progression (DP) occurred in 17 patients, while 15 patients had insufficient embolization (IE) with 18 rCBS. The mean rCBS timing interval was 76 days with 129 and 12 days due to DP or IE. The most common rCBS locations were the carotid bulb and the main trunk of the external carotid artery (n = 20, 57%), followed by internal carotid artery (n = 8, 23%), distal branch of the external carotid artery (n = 4, 11%), and common carotid artery (n = 3, 9%). Endovascular management was technically successful in all patients by reconstruction (n = 7, 20%) or destruction (n = 28, 80%) techniques. Three patients (9%) had procedure-related complications. No rCBS was observed in all affected arteries after the last embolization in a mean 11-month clinical follow-up. Conclusion: rCBS may result from DP or IE. The common location of IE-related rCBS usually occurred in the carotid branches. It occurred within two weeks of CBS largely because of the underestimation of the extension of the affected carotid artery. In addition, DP is natural in head and neck cancer after aggressive treatment. Thus, endovascular management remained an effective method to manage rCBS.

[1]  C. Luo,et al.  Verification of bleeding points in carotid blowout syndrome using guidewire manipulation , 2018, Neuroradiology.

[2]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  J. Lirng,et al.  Endovascular Management of Post-Irradiated Carotid Blowout Syndrome , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Ming-Huang Chen,et al.  Predisposing factors, management, and prognostic evaluation of acute carotid blowout syndrome. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  T. de Baère,et al.  Polytetrafluoroethylene‐covered nitinol stent graft for treatment of carotid artery blowout syndrome in head and neck cancer patients , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  K. Himei,et al.  Frequency, outcome and prognostic factors of carotid blowout syndrome after hypofractionated re-irradiation of head and neck cancer using CyberKnife: a multi-institutional study. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  T. Shpitzer,et al.  Transarterial embolization for acute head and neck bleeding: Eight‐year experience with emphasis on rebleeding risk in cancer patients , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  S. Tjoumakaris,et al.  Endovascular management of carotid blowout. , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[9]  P. Johnstone,et al.  Risk of carotid blowout after reirradiation of the head and neck: a systematic review. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J. Bello,et al.  Covered stents safely utilized to prevent catastrophic hemorrhage in patients with advanced head and neck malignancy , 2011, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[11]  J. Lirng,et al.  Distal marginal stenosis: a contributing factor in delayed carotid occlusion of a patient with carotid blowout syndrome treated with stent grafts. , 2010, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[12]  J. Lirng,et al.  Patients with head and neck cancers and associated postirradiated carotid blowout syndrome: endovascular therapeutic methods and outcomes. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  C. Luo,et al.  Transarterial embolization of acute external carotid blowout syndrome with profuse oronasal bleeding by N-butyl-cyanoacrylate. , 2006, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[14]  C. Luo,et al.  Role of CT and Endovascular Embolization in Managing Pseudoaneurysms of the Internal Maxillary Artery , 2006, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[15]  C. Sasaki,et al.  Recurrent carotid blowout syndrome: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in a newly recognized subgroup of patients. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  C. Sasaki,et al.  Endovascular therapy for the carotid blowout syndrome in head and neck surgical patients: diagnostic and managerial considerations. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  V. Lai,et al.  Endovascular treatment paradigm of carotid blowout syndrome: review of 8-years experience. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[18]  G. Nesbit,et al.  Stent-grafts in the treatment of emergent or urgent carotid artery disease: review of 25 cases. , 2008, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.