Students' and Teachers' Decision-Making Fit Before and after the Transition to Junior High School

Student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred student decision-making opportunities in mathematics classrooms are assessed before and after the transition to junior high school in a longitudinal sample of 2210 students in 117 pre-transition and 137 post-transition classrooms. The findings include: (a) students and teachers perceive fewer actual student decision-making opportunities after than before the transition; (b) students express a preference for more decision-making opportunities while teachers believe students should have fewer opportunities after than before the transition; and (c) the congruency between students' actual and preferred perceptions declines after the transition while teacher perceptions both before and after the transition are highly congruent. It is suggested that there is a "developmental mismatch" between maturing children and the classroom environments they experience before and after the transition. This mismatch may be related to the negative changes in student beliefs and behaviors that have been observed when students enter junior high school.

[1]  C. Midgley,et al.  The transition to junior high school: Beliefs of pre- and posttransition teachers , 1988, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[2]  C. Midgley,et al.  Student, Teacher, and Observer Perceptions of the Classroom Environment Before and after the Transition to Junior High School , 1988 .

[3]  D. Iver Students' Decision-Making Congruence in Mathematics Classrooms: A Person-Environment Fit Analysis. , 1986 .

[4]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Student and Teacher Perceptions of the Environment of Elementary School Classrooms , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  D. Reuman Decision-Making in Junior High School Mathematics: Student-Classroom Discrepancy. , 1984 .

[6]  A. Petersen,et al.  School from the Young Adolescent's Perspective: A Descriptive Report , 1984 .

[7]  P. Lee,et al.  Elementary school children's perceptions of their actual and ideal school experience: A developmental study. , 1983 .

[8]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Student Achievement as a Function of Person-Environment Fit: A Regression Surface Analysis. , 1983 .

[9]  B. Fraser,et al.  A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environments as perceived by science teachers and students , 1983 .

[10]  B. Fraser Differences Between Student and Teacher Perceptions of Actual and Preferred Classroom Learning Environment , 1982 .

[11]  Randy M. Jones,et al.  Social Characteristics of Early Adolescents , 1982 .

[12]  B. Fraser Validity and Use of Individualized Classroom Environment Questionnaire. , 1981 .

[13]  C. Power Changes in students' attitudes towards science in the transition between Australian elementary and secondary schools , 1981 .

[14]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[15]  D. Blyth,et al.  Entry into early adolescence: the impact of school structure, puberty, and early dating on self-esteem. , 1979, American sociological review.

[16]  Rudolf H. Moos,et al.  Evaluating Educational Environments , 1979 .

[17]  David E. Hunt,et al.  Person-Environment Interaction: A Challenge Found Wanting Before it was Tried , 1975 .

[18]  Michael P. Cussen A comparative study of student and teacher perceptions regarding decision-making in selected open and traditional classrooms. , 1974 .

[19]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  Disturbance in the self-image at adolescence. , 1973, American sociological review.

[20]  B. J. Wolfson,et al.  Perceptions of Decision-Making in Elementary-School Classrooms , 1968, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  Who Decides What in the Classroom? , 1965, The Elementary School Journal.

[22]  N. Lewis A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .