The health care information directive

BackgroundDevelopments in information technology promise to revolutionise the delivery of health care by providing access to data in a timely and efficient way. Information technology also raises several important concerns about the confidentiality and privacy of health data. New and existing legislation in Europe and North America may make access to patient level data difficult with consequent impact on research and health surveillance. Although research is being conducted on technical solutions to protect the privacy of personal health information, there is very little research on ways to improve individuals power over their health information. This paper proposes a health care information directive, analogous to an advance directive, to facilitate choices regarding health information disclosure.Results and DiscussionA health care information directive is described which creates a decision matrix that combines the ethical appropriateness of the use of personal health information with the sensitivity of the data. It creates a range of possibilities with in which individuals can choose to contribute health information with or without consent, or not to contribute information at all.ConclusionThe health care information directive may increase individuals understanding of the uses of health information and increase their willingness to contribute certain kinds of health information. Further refinement and evaluation of the directive is required.

[1]  C. Safran,et al.  Internet based repository of medical records that retains patient confidentiality , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  E. Gold,et al.  Privacy, confidentiality, and the use of medical records in research. , 1980, Science.

[3]  L. Gostin,et al.  Legal issues concerning electronic health information: privacy, quality, and liability. , 1999, JAMA.

[4]  L. Gostin,et al.  Health Services Research: Public Benefits, Personal Privacy, and Proprietary Interests , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  P. Singer,et al.  The cancer specific advance directive , 1998, Cancer.

[6]  B. Yawn,et al.  The impact of requiring patient authorization for use of data in medical records research. , 1998, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  I. Kohane,et al.  Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  E G Knox,et al.  Confidential medical records and epidemiological research. , 1992, BMJ.

[10]  L. Melton,et al.  The threat to medical-records research. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Woolf,et al.  Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. , 2000, Archives of family medicine.

[12]  C Warlow,et al.  Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Alistair Kelman,et al.  Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century , 2000, J. Inf. Law Technol..

[14]  William J. Kirsch,et al.  The protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data: the work of the Council of Europe, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and the European Economic Community , 1982, Legal Issues of Economic Integration.

[15]  L. Melton,et al.  Potential effect of authorization bias on medical record research. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[16]  P. Singer,et al.  Disease-specific advance directives , 1994, The Lancet.

[17]  J S Gardner,et al.  Medical records and privacy: empirical effects of legislation. , 1999, Health services research.

[18]  Christopher D. Hunter Database nation: the death of privacy in the 21st century , 2000 .

[19]  Eike-Henner W. Kluge Professional codes for electronic HC record protection: ethical, legal, economic and structural issues , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.