Low-Reynolds-Number Aerodynamics of a Flapping Rigid Flat Plate

Two- and three-dimensional low-aspect-ratio (AR = 4) hovering airfoil/wing aerodynamics at a low Reynolds number (Re = 100) are numerically investigated. Regarding fluid physics, in addition to the well-known leading-edge vortex and wake-capture mechanisms, a persistent jet, induced by the shed vortices in the wake during previous strokes, and tip vortices can significantly influence the lift and power performance. While in classical stationary wing theory the tip vortices are seen as wasted energy, here, they can interact with the leading-edge vortex to contribute to the lift generated without increasing the power requirements. Using surrogate modeling techniques, the two- and three-dimensional time-averaged aerodynamic forces were predicted well over a large range of kinematic motions when compared with the Navier-Stokes solutions. The combined effects of tip vortices, leading-edge vortex, and jet can be manipulated by the choice of kinematics to make a three-dimensional wing aerodynamically better or worse than an infinitely long wing. The environmental sensitivity during hovering for select kinematics is also examined. Different freestream strengths and orientations are imposed, with the impact on vortex generation and wake interaction investigated.

[1]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Wing transmission for a micromechanical flying insect , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[2]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[3]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[4]  Hao Liu,et al.  Flapping Wings and Aerodynamic Lift: The Role of Leading-Edge Vortices , 2007 .

[5]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  High-Order-Accurate Methods for Complex Unsteady Subsonic Flows , 1999 .

[6]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers: Flapping-Wing Aerodynamics , 2010 .

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  Peter Freymuth,et al.  Thrust generation by an airfoil in hover modes , 1990 .

[9]  Kirill V. Rozhdestvensky,et al.  Aerohydrodynamics of flapping-wing propulsors , 2003 .

[10]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes , 2002 .

[11]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[12]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Designs for Computer Experiments , 1989 .

[14]  Hao Liu,et al.  Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity , 2010 .

[15]  Wei Shyy,et al.  A study of finite difference approximations to steady-state, convection-dominated flow problems , 1985 .

[16]  Jiri Blazek,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications , 2001 .

[17]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[18]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .

[19]  C. Ellington The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. III. Kinematics , 1984 .

[20]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Global Design Optimization for Aerodynamics and Rocket Propulsion Components , 2013 .

[21]  T.N. Pornsin-Sirirak,et al.  MEMS wing technology for a battery-powered ornithopter , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Thirteenth Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Cat. No.00CH36308).

[22]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Unsteady Fluid Physics and Surrogate Modeling of Low Reynolds Number, Flapping Airfoils , 2008 .

[23]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Response surface techniques for diffuser shape optimization , 1997 .

[24]  M. Ashley-Ross,et al.  Kinematics of the transition between aquatic and terrestrial locomotion in the newt Taricha torosa , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  DISSECTING INSECT FLIGHT , 2005 .

[26]  D. Lentink,et al.  Novel micro aircraft inspired by insect flight , 2006 .

[27]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Can Tip Vortices Enhance Lift of a Flapping Wing , 2009 .

[28]  Kevin Knowles,et al.  Aerodynamic modelling of insect-like flapping flight for micro air vehicles , 2006 .

[29]  D. M. Titterington,et al.  Neural Networks: A Review from a Statistical Perspective , 1994 .

[30]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Computational Modeling for Fluid Flow and Interfacial Transport (Dover Books on Engineering) , 1993 .

[31]  C. Ellington The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  T. Weis-Fogh Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals , 1973 .

[33]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamics and flow control for flapping wing flyers , 2003 .

[34]  Donald Rockwell,et al.  Flow structure on finite-span wings due to pitch-up motion , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[35]  Christopher T. Orlowski,et al.  Dynamics, stability, and control analyses of flapping wing micro-air vehicles , 2012 .

[36]  Edward A. Luke,et al.  Loci: a rule-based framework for parallel multi-disciplinary simulation synthesis , 2005, J. Funct. Program..

[37]  Mao Sun,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[38]  Ramji Kamakoti,et al.  Validation of a New Parallel All-Speed CFD Code in a Rule-Based Framework for Multidisciplinary Applications , 2006 .

[39]  R. Gunst Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[40]  R. Haftka,et al.  Ensemble of surrogates , 2007 .

[41]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers: Index , 2007 .

[42]  D. Pines,et al.  Challenges Facing Future Micro-Air-Vehicle Development , 2006 .

[43]  C. Ellington Limitations on Animal Flight Performance , 1991 .

[44]  J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aerodynamics , 1984 .

[45]  Valder Steffen,et al.  Ensemble of Surrogates: a Framework based on Minimization of the Mean Integrated Square Error , 2008 .

[46]  T. Colonius,et al.  Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[47]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[48]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila , 2003, Science.

[49]  Gerardo Jimenez-Sanchez,et al.  Developing a Platform for Genomic Medicine in Mexico , 2003, Science.

[50]  P. Lissaman,et al.  Technical aspects of microscale flight systems , 1998 .

[51]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  A Surrogate Model Approach in 2-D Versus 3-D Flapping Wing Aerodynamic Analysis , 2008 .

[52]  U. Norberg Structure, form, and function of flight in engineering and the living world. , 2002 .

[53]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Fluid physics and surrogate modeling of a low Reynolds number flapping rigid flat plate , 2010 .

[54]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles , 1999 .

[55]  T. Weis-Fogh Energetics of Hovering Flight in Hummingbirds and in Drosophila , 1972 .