Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right ‘job’ for your technology

Abstract In light of the recent economic crisis, many industrial firms attempt to capture additional value from their technologies by means of open innovation strategies. Besides acquiring external technology, many firms therefore increasingly try to license their own technology to other firms either exclusively or in addition to its application in their own products. This article shows that technology licensing offers important strategic benefits beyond generating licensing revenues, which underscore the need for an integrated management of technology licensing activities. Therefore, this article extends the concept of job-related markets that was recently developed in the managerial literature. A ‘job’ is the fundamental problem that a customer needs to resolve in a particular situation. Managers may transfer this job-related understanding to technology licensing activities because the right ‘job’ for a technology may be outside a firm’s boundaries, and it may help firms to identify additional licensing opportunities. On this basis, the article presents the concept of an integrated technology exploitation roadmap, which allows firms to use the job-related markets to integrate technology licensing in their strategic planning processes. An example of a machinery firm shows how this roadmap may contribute to strengthening a firm’s licensing business.

[1]  D. Teece Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[2]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[3]  A. W. Pearson,et al.  Licensing as an alternative to foreign direct investment an empirical investigation , 1988 .

[4]  Yan-Ru Li,et al.  The technological roadmap of Cisco's business ecosystem , 2009 .

[5]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[6]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Obtaining Strategic Advantage from Being Imitated: When Can Encouraging Clones Pay? , 1995 .

[7]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Technology management as part of strategic planning – some empirical results , 1998 .

[8]  Andrea Fosfuri The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[9]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[10]  Young Jun Kim,et al.  Choosing between international technology licensing partners: An empirical analysis of U.S. biotechnology firms , 2009 .

[11]  Julie L Davis,et al.  Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets , 2001 .

[12]  Stijn Viaene,et al.  Linking technology intelligence to open innovation , 2010 .

[13]  B. R. Guile,et al.  Profiting from innovation , 1992, [Proceedings 1992] IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[14]  Roger W. Mills,et al.  Using Scenario Thinking to Make Real Options Relevant to Managers: A Case Illustration , 2006 .

[15]  Rolf Mirus A Note on the Choice between Licensing and Direct Foreign Investment , 1980 .

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[17]  C. Hill Strategies for Exploiting Technological Innovations: When and When Not to License , 1992 .

[18]  D. Teece Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[19]  Tariq S. Durrani,et al.  Managing the technology acquisition process , 1998 .

[20]  Derek Barker,et al.  Technology foresight using roadmaps , 1995 .

[21]  Pieter Groenveld Roadmapping Integrates Business and Technology , 1997 .

[22]  Savvas A. Tassou,et al.  Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). Development of an integrated process plan , 2002 .

[23]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[24]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[25]  Farok J. Contractor,et al.  Choosing Between Direct Investment and Licensing: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Tests , 1984 .

[26]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[27]  Marc Gruber,et al.  Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[28]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  RETRACTED: Technology commercialization intelligence: Organizational antecedents and performance consequences , 2009 .

[30]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[31]  M. Dowling,et al.  Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms , 2004 .

[32]  I. Petrick,et al.  Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions , 2004 .

[33]  Arvind Sahay,et al.  Emerging Role of Technology Licensing in the Development of Global Product Strategy: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions , 1996 .

[34]  K. Motohashi Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms , 2008 .

[35]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[36]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Technology roadmapping for R&D planning: The case of the Korean parts and materials industry , 2007 .

[37]  Thomas A. Kappel,et al.  Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future , 2001 .

[38]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[39]  Andrew C. Corbett Experiential Learning within the Process of Opportunity Identification and Exploitation , 2005 .

[40]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  RETRACTION NOTICE: Technology licensing strategies: the interaction of process and content characteristics , 2009 .

[42]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Collaboration and innovation: a review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation , 2005 .

[43]  Jean-Philippe Escher Design and implementation of technology marketing organizations , 2003 .

[44]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature , 2006 .

[45]  Marcus Ehrhardt,et al.  Network effects, standardisation and competitive strategy: how companies influence the emergence of dominant designs , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[46]  F. Kodama Technology fusion and the new R & D: Harvard Business Review, 70 (4), 70–78 (July/August 1992) , 1993 .

[47]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of technology trade: towards a pro-licensing era? , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[48]  F. Cesaroni Technology Strategies in the Knowledge Economy: The Licensing Activity of Himont , 2003 .

[49]  Stefan M. Koruna,et al.  External technology commercialisation - policy guidelines , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[50]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Gains and pains from licensing: Patent-portfolios as strategic weapons in the cardiac rhythm management industry , 1999 .

[51]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[52]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[53]  Young Jun Kim,et al.  Determinants of technology licensing: the case of licensors , 2006 .

[54]  Francis Bidault,et al.  Global licensing strategies and technology pricing , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[55]  Enno Weiss Functional market concept for planning technological innovations , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[56]  R. Grant Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors , 2003 .

[57]  A. Gambardella,et al.  The Market for Patents in Europe , 2006 .

[58]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Market for Innovation: Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2007 .

[59]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[60]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The Drivers of Technology Licensing: An Industry Comparison , 2007 .

[61]  Arvind Sahay,et al.  The Role of Resource Access, Market Considerations, and the Nature of Innovation in Pursuit of Standards in the New Product Development Process , 2003 .

[62]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[63]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Licensing duration in foreign markets: A real options perspective , 2009 .

[64]  David Kline,et al.  Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels , 2003 .

[65]  H. Chesbrough Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[66]  Nika Murovec,et al.  Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model , 2009 .

[67]  D. Probert,et al.  Technology Roadmapping for A Service Organization , 2004 .

[68]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[69]  V. Chiesa,et al.  The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm , 2011 .

[70]  U. Lichtenthaler Integrated Roadmaps for Open Innovation , 2008 .

[71]  Julian Lowe,et al.  R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets , 1998 .

[72]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[73]  Sadao Nagaoka,et al.  The incidence of cross-licensing: A theory and new evidence on the firm and contract level determinants , 2006 .

[74]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[75]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[76]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[77]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[78]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent portfolios for strategic R & D planning , 1998 .

[79]  Arvids A. Ziedonis Real Options in Technology Licensing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[80]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Finding the Right Job for Your Product , 2007 .

[81]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[82]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Integrating Innovation and Learning Curve Theory: An Enabler for Moving Nanotechnologies and Other Emerging Process Technologies into Production , 2004 .

[83]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Managing customer oriented research , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..