In Search of Fluency: What is it and How Can we Teach It?

This paper is an exploration of the phenomenon of second language speech fluency and how it may be facilitated through instruction. An overview and synthesis of research on fluency in second language speech is presented in order to help in defining the construct and determining what elements of speech proficiency are most relevant to fluency. The empirical research is discussed in light of psycholinguistic knowledge about mental processes underlying second language production, and a model of fluent speech production is posited which centres on automatic processing and the importance of automatic retrieval of a repertoire of formulaic language units in spontaneous speech. This model serves as a starting point for a pedagogy of fluency which combines elements of automatization and formulaic competence. An example of a workshop is described in which learners were guided through a series of classroom tasks designed to promote automatization of formulaic language units and fluency.

[1]  R. Schmidt.  Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  W. Chafe,et al.  Some reasons for hesitating , 1980 .

[3]  F. Coulmas.  On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae , 1979 .

[4]  James R. Nattinger,et al.  Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching , 1992 .

[5]  Ellen Ricard.  Beyond Fossilization: A Course in Strategies and Techniques in Pronunciation for Advanced Adult Learners. , 1986 .

[6]  Barbara F. Freed.  What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent , 1995 .

[7]  H. Riggenbach.  Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations , 1991 .

[8]  B. Mclaughlin,et al.  SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: AN INFORMATION-PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE† , 1983 .

[9]  P. Lennon.  Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach* , 1990 .

[10]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[11]  N. Segalowitz.  Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance , 2000 .

[12]  H. W. Dechert,et al.  Pauses and intonation as indicators of verbal planning in second-language speech productions: Two examples from a case study , 1980 .

[13]  H. W. Dechert,et al.  The syntactical distribution of pauses in English spoken as a second language by French students , 1980 .

[14]  T. Hickey.  Identifying formulas in first language acquisition , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[15]  Francine Chambers,et al.  What do we mean by fluency , 1997 .

[16]  P. Lennon.  THE ADVANCED LEARNER AT LARGE IN THE L2 COMMUNITY: DEVELOPMENTS IN SPOKEN PERFORMANCE , 1990 .

[17]  Jim Miller,et al.  Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse , 1998 .

[18]  R. Weinert.  The Role of Formulaic Language in Second Language Acquisition: A Review , 1995 .

[19]  R. Hawkins,et al.  The development of fluency in advanced learners of French , 1996 .

[20]  Ann M. Peters,et al.  The Units of Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[21]  Paul Nation,et al.  Improving speaking fluency , 1989 .

[22]  H. W. Dechert,et al.  Temporal variables in first and second language speech production , 1980 .

[23]  P. Skehan.  语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[24]  Alison Wray,et al.  The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model , 2000 .

[25]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .