The Comparative Analysis of Different HD-TES Montages

Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) as a non-invasive neuromodulation tool has modulatory effects on brain injury recovery and cognitive enhancement. Conventional TES induces a huge individual difference in modulation effects since it can not focus on the specific target. High-Definition TES (HD- TES) has enhanced the targeted focus of TES and could potentially solve the problem. Currently, the design of HD-TES montage divide into two types: HD-4*1 and HD-Ring, yet, the difference between the two montages is unclear. The maximum norm of the electric field (NormE), size, and overlap ratio of stimulation area between two electrode montages were compared using 10 individual head models with the same electrode size. The NormE (R2=0.997, p=0.000) and the stimulation volume (R2=0.974, p=0.000) produced by the two electrode montages showed a high correlation, the stimulation area overlap ratio (min=0.631, max=0.984) was relatively large when the electrodes have the same area, which could help the selection of HD-TES electrode montages during the experiments.

[1]  Jinglong Wu,et al.  Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation , 2021, Human brain mapping.

[2]  A. Indahlastari,et al.  Individualized tDCS modeling predicts functional connectivity changes within the working memory network in older adults , 2021, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  A. Thielscher,et al.  Estimation of individually induced e-field strength during transcranial electric stimulation using the head circumference , 2021, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  M. Nitsche,et al.  fMRI and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES): A systematic review of parameter space and outcomes , 2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  Myles Mc Laughlin,et al.  Investigating the Feasibility of Epicranial Cortical Stimulation Using Concentric-Ring Electrodes: A Novel Minimally Invasive Neuromodulation Method , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  M. M. Samani,et al.  Basic and functional effects of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)—An introduction , 2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  How to target inter-regional phase synchronization with dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2017, NeuroImage.

[8]  Cam-CAN Group,et al.  The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample , 2017, NeuroImage.

[9]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  Effects of electrode displacement in high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation: A computational study , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[11]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing , 2014, BMC Neurology.

[13]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[15]  M. Bikson,et al.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.