Arithmetic on a Parallel Computer: Perception Versus Logic

This article discusses the properties of a controllable, flexible, hybrid parallel computing architecture that potentially merges pattern recognition and arithmetic. Humans perform integer arithmetic in a fundamentally different way than logic-based computers. Even though the human approach to arithmetic is both slow and inaccurate it can have substantial advantages when useful approximations (“intuition”) are more valuable than high precision. Such a computational strategy may be particularly useful when computers based on nanocomponents become feasible because it offers a way to make use of the potential power of these massively parallel systems. Because the system architecture is inspired by neuroscience and is applied to cognitive problems, occasional mention is made of experimental data from both fields when appropriate.

[1]  D. Mumford,et al.  The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  W. Pitts,et al.  How we know universals; the perception of auditory and visual forms. , 1947, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[3]  H. Blum Biological shape and visual science (part I) , 1973 .

[4]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Introduction to neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[5]  Josiah Royce,et al.  The psychology of invention. , 1898 .

[6]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Radar signal categorization using a neural network , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  F. A. Yeldham The Story of Reckoning in the Middle Ages , 1934, Nature.

[8]  Michael J. Lyons,et al.  Perception psychology: Visual structure of a Japanese Zen garden , 2002, Nature.

[9]  V. Bringuier,et al.  Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. , 1999, Science.

[10]  B KimiaBenjamin,et al.  Shapes, shocks, and deformations I , 1995 .

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Neural Evidence Linking Visual Object Enumeration and Attention , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Jacques Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1949 .

[13]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[14]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[15]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[16]  W. McCulloch WHY THE MIND IS IN THE HEAD?1 , 1950 .

[17]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Medial-point description of shape: a representation for action coding and its psychophysical correlates , 1998, Vision Research.

[18]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  James A. Anderson,et al.  If we compute faster, do we understand better? , 1997 .

[20]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Shapes, shocks and wiggles , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  Benjamin B. Kimia,et al.  Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: The components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  L. Finkel,et al.  Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks , 1998, Vision Research.

[23]  Ling Guan,et al.  A network of networks processing model for image regularization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[24]  B. Julesz,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes , 1994, Nature.

[25]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.