Pragmatic Connectives as Predicates. The Case of Inferential Connectives

This chapter investigates the linguistic description and formal representation of some pragmatic inferential connectives in French. We show that connectives expressing consequence, opposition or reformulation (like anyway in English) presuppose an abstract relation between propositional arguments of certain semantic types. We first contrast inferential and non-inferential connectives, then we turn to the semantic types of the propositional arguments to lay down some basic distinctions. Finally we substantiate the relations themselves. We use a version of generalized quantification over proofs to describe the inferential constraints which define the various relations presupposed by the connectives. The very possibility of such a description suggests that inferential connectives have a genuine (presupposed) predicative content.

[1]  Sabine Iatridou,et al.  On the contribution of conditionalthen , 1993 .

[2]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Appears in the Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Representation and Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge: Polysemy, Ambiguity, and Generativity, Palo Alto, CA, March 27-29, 1995 Lexical Acquisition via Constraint Solving , 1995 .

[3]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation , 1993 .

[4]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in Flux , 1988 .

[5]  Irene Santini de Sigel,et al.  Communication and Cognition , 1998 .

[6]  David R. Traum,et al.  Utterance units and grounding in spoken dialogue , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[7]  Eve Sweetser.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Subject index , 1990 .

[8]  J. Searle,et al.  Speech act theory and pragmatics , 1980 .

[9]  Remko Scha,et al.  A syntactic approach to discourse semantics , 1984 .

[10]  Nuel D. Belnap,et al.  Entailment : the logic of relevance and necessity , 1975 .

[11]  J. Hintikka.  Knowledge and belief , 1962 .

[12]  M. Morel,et al.  La concession en français , 1996 .

[13]  Manfred Bierwisch,et al.  Semantic Structure and Illocutionary Force , 1980 .

[14]  Corinne Rossari,et al.  Connecteurs de conséquence et portée sémantique , 1997 .

[15]  J. Anscombre,et al.  L'argumentation dans la langue , 1976 .

[16]  Michael A. McRobbie,et al.  Automated theorem proving for non-classical logics , 1988, Research Notes in Theoretical Computer Science.

[17]  F.J.M.M. Veltman.  Data semantics and the pragmatics of indicative conditionals , 1986 .

[18]  Charlotte Hybertie.  La conséquence en français , 1996 .

[19]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  Studies in linguistic semantics , 1979 .

[20]  Sheila Glasbey,et al.  Distinguishing between events and times: Some evidence from the semantics of then , 1993 .

[21]  Athanassios Tzouvaras.  Aspects of analytic deduction , 1996, J. Philos. Log..

[22]  Oswald Ducrot,et al.  Les modificateurs déréalisants , 1995 .

[23]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  Interpretation as Abduction , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[24]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[25]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[26]  Manfred Stede,et al.  Ma(r)king concessions in English and German , 1995, ArXiv.

[27]  Alistair Knott,et al.  A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations , 1996 .

[28]  Frank Veltman,et al.  Defaults in update semantics , 1996, J. Philos. Log..

[29]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Foundations of Illocutionary Logic , 1985 .

[30]  Ekkehard König,et al.  On Conditionals: CONDITIONALS, CONCESSIVE CONDITIONALS AND CONCESSIVES: AREAS OF CONTRAST, OVERLAP AND NEUTRALIZATION , 1986 .

[31]  Susan Rothstein.  Adverbial quantification over events , 1995 .

[32]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Reference to abstract objects in discourse , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[33]  Wolfgang Bibel,et al.  Automated Theorem Proving , 1987, Artificial Intelligence / Künstliche Intelligenz.

[34]  Livia Polanyi,et al.  A Theory of Discourse Structure and Discourse Coherence in Papers from the General Session at the Twenty-First Regional Meeting. , 1985 .

[35]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[36]  A. Bonomi,et al.  Only: Association with focus in event semantics , 1993 .

[37]  E. Roulet.  L'articulation du discours en français contemporain , 1991 .

[38]  Angela Ferrari,et al.  Connessioni : uno studio integrato della subordinazione avverbiale , 1995 .

[39]  G. Schurz.  Relevant Deduction. From Solving Paradoxes Towards a General Theory , 1991 .

[40]  O. Ducrot,et al.  Les Mots du discours , 1981 .

[41]  Eve Sweetser.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: List of abbreviations , 1990 .

[42]  E. Manzotti.  Aspetti linguistici dell' esemplificazione , 1995 .

[43]  Jacques Jayez.  L'inférence en langue maternelle : le problème des connecteurs, représentation et calcul , 1988 .

[44]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[45]  James Grieve.  A Dictionary of French Connectors , 1996 .

[46]  James F. Allen.  An Interval-Based Representation of Temporal Knowledge , 1981, IJCAI.

[47]  Perlindström.  First Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers , 1966 .

[48]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[49]  D. Blakemore.  Semantic Constraints on Relevance , 1987 .

[50]  Benoît de Cornulier.  Effets de sens , 1985 .

[51]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[52]  Michael Elhadad.  Generating Argumentative Judgment Determiners , 1993, AAAI.

[53]  Rachel Reichman,et al.  Getting computers to talk like you and me , 1985 .