Population Status of a Cryptic Top Predator: An Island-Wide Assessment of Tigers in Sumatran Rainforests

Large carnivores living in tropical rainforests are under immense pressure from the rapid conversion of their habitat. In response, millions of dollars are spent on conserving these species. However, the cost-effectiveness of such investments is poorly understood and this is largely because the requisite population estimates are difficult to achieve at appropriate spatial scales for these secretive species. Here, we apply a robust detection/non-detection sampling technique to produce the first reliable population metric (occupancy) for a critically endangered large carnivore; the Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae). From 2007–2009, seven landscapes were surveyed through 13,511 km of transects in 394 grid cells (17×17 km). Tiger sign was detected in 206 cells, producing a naive estimate of 0.52. However, after controlling for an unequal detection probability (where p = 0.13±0.017; ±S.E.), the estimated tiger occupancy was 0.72±0.048. Whilst the Sumatra-wide survey results gives cause for optimism, a significant negative correlation between occupancy and recent deforestation was found. For example, the Northern Riau landscape had an average deforestation rate of 9.8%/yr and by far the lowest occupancy (0.33±0.055). Our results highlight the key tiger areas in need of protection and have led to one area (Leuser-Ulu Masen) being upgraded as a ‘global priority’ for wild tiger conservation. However, Sumatra has one of the highest global deforestation rates and the two largest tiger landscapes identified in this study will become highly fragmented if their respective proposed roads networks are approved. Thus, it is vital that the Indonesian government tackles these threats, e.g. through improved land-use planning, if it is to succeed in meeting its ambitious National Tiger Recovery Plan targets of doubling the number of Sumatran tigers by 2022.

[1]  T. Lovejoy,et al.  Cautious Optimism over Norway‐Indonesia REDD Pact , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  G. Guillera‐Arroita Impact of sampling with replacement in occupancy studies with spatial replication , 2011 .

[3]  B. Gratwicke,et al.  How many wild tigers are there? An estimate for 2008 , 2010 .

[4]  P. Nyhus,et al.  Characterizing human-tiger conflict in Sumatra, Indonesia: implications for conservation , 2004, Oryx.

[5]  G. Guillera‐Arroita,et al.  Monitoring tigers with confidence. , 2010, Integrative zoology.

[6]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[7]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Site Occupancy Models with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities , 2006, Biometrics.

[8]  M. Sunquist,et al.  The Social Organization of Tigers (Panthera Tigris) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal , 1981 .

[9]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India , 2003 .

[10]  E. Wikramanayake,et al.  A landscape‐based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population , 2011 .

[11]  H. Wibisono,et al.  Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae): a review of conservation status. , 2010, Integrative zoology.

[12]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring carnivore populations at the landscape scale: occupancy modelling of tigers from sign surveys , 2011 .

[13]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Tigers on trails: occupancy modeling for cluster sampling. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  A. Roth,et al.  The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar , 2003 .

[15]  N. Leader‐Williams,et al.  Assessing the viability of tiger subpopulations in a fragmented landscape , 2006 .