Comparative woodland caribou population surveys in Slate Islands Provincial Park, Ontario

We evaluated three methods of estimating population size of woodland caribou (boreal ecotype) on the Slate Islands in northern Ontario. Located on the north shore of Lake Superior, the Slate Islands provide a protected and closed population with very limited predator influence that is ideal for a comparison of survey methods. Our objective was to determine the costs and benefits of three population estimation techniques: (1) forward looking infrared (FLIR) technology to count the number of caribou on regular-spaced transects flown by fixed-wing aircraft; (2) observers to count the number of caribou seen or heard while walking random transects in the spring; and, (3) mark-recapture sampling of caribou pellets using DNA analysis. FLIR and the genetics 3-window approach gave much tighter confidence intervals but similar population estimates were found from all three techniques based on their overlapping confidence intervals. There are various costs and benefits to each technique that are discussed further. Understanding the costs and benefits of different population estimation techniques is necessary to develop cost-effective programs for inventorying and monitoring this threatened species not only on the Slate Islands but for other populations as well.

[1]  J. Nichols,et al.  Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments , 1992 .

[2]  S. E. Brodie.  New York, New York, USA , 1996 .

[3]  F. C. Lincoln.  Calculating waterfowl abundance on the basis of banding returns , 1930 .

[4]  Sightability model for California bighorn sheep in canyonlands using forward-looking infrared (FLIR) , 2004 .

[5]  A. Chao,et al.  Classical Closed-population Capture-Recapture Models , 2005 .

[6]  B. Pond,et al.  Woodland Caribou Extirpation and Anthropogenic Landscape Disturbance in Ontario , 2007 .

[7]  S. Buckland.  Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[8]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[9]  D. McDonald,et al.  TECHNICAL ADVANCES: Effects of genotyping protocols on success and errors in identifying individual river otters (Lontra canadensis) from their faeces , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[10]  D. C. Thomas.  Needed: less counting of caribou and more ecology , 1998 .

[11]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Separating components of detection probability in abundance estimation: an overview with diverse examples , 2004 .

[12]  D. G. Chapman.  Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoölogical somple censuses , 1951 .

[13]  S. Moore,et al.  Bovine and ovine DNA microsatellites from the EMBL and GENBANK databases. , 2009, Animal genetics.

[14]  R. King.  Ruffed Grouse Management , 1937 .

[15]  D. Davis,et al.  Estimating the numbers of wildlife populations , 1980 .

[16]  G. Caughley,et al.  Analysis of vertebrate populations , 1977 .

[17]  J. Beringer,et al.  Evaluation of aerial thermal imaging for detecting white-tailed deer in a deciduous forest environment , 2003 .

[18]  M. Cronin,et al.  VARIATION IN MITOCHONDRIAL DNA AND MICROSATELLITE DNA IN CARIBOU (RANGIFER TARANDUS) IN NORTH AMERICA , 2005 .

[19]  Anne Turner-Henson,et al.  Sampling Rare Populations: Strategies for Finding Subgroups for Health Surveys , 1991 .

[20]  Peter N. Hettinga.  Use of Fecal DNA to Estimate Population Demographics of the Boreal and Southern Mountain Ecotypes of Woodland Caribou , 2010 .

[21]  E. Sharp,et al.  USING THERMAL IMAGERY IN THE AERIAL SURVEY OF ANIMALS , 1998 .

[22]  Laura Finnegan,et al.  Integrating multiple analytical approaches to spatially delineate and characterize genetic population structure: an application to boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Canada , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[23]  R. Rausch,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Aerial Moose Censusing , 1974 .

[24]  Diet quality and intake requirements of adult female caribou of the Denali herd, Alaska , 1990 .

[25]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other artiodactyls , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[26]  R. Courtois,et al.  An Aerial Survey Technique for the Forest-Dwelling Ecotype of Woodland Caribou, Rangifer tarandus caribou , 2003 .

[27]  D. Stocker,et al.  The Use of Portable Thermal Imaging for Estimating Deer Population Density in Forest Habitats , 1997 .

[28]  J. B. Gray,et al.  PARELAPHOSTRONGYLUS ODOCOILEI (NEMATODA: PROTOSTRONGYLIDAE) AND A PROTOSTRONGYLID NEMATODE IN WOODLAND CARIBOU (RANGIFER TARANDUS CARIBOU) OF ALBERTA, CANADA , 1986, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[29]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[30]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1994 .

[31]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[32]  S. Schemnitz,et al.  Wildlife Management Techniques Manual , 1980 .

[33]  G. Caughley.  Bias in Aerial Survey , 1974 .

[34]  G. Seber,et al.  The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[35]  S. Boutin,et al.  Genetic diversity and relatedness of boreal caribou populations in western Canada , 2004 .

[36]  Brian P. Dreher,et al.  genecap: a program for analysis of multilocus genotype data for non‐invasive sampling and capture‐recapture population estimation , 2004 .

[37]  B. Cargnelutti,et al.  Testing density estimators on a fallow deer population of known size , 1996 .

[38]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[39]  D. Drake,et al.  Counting a suburban deer population using Forward-Looking Infrared radar and road counts , 2005 .

[40]  Michael K. Schwartz,et al.  ESTIMATING ANIMAL ABUNDANCE USING NONINVASIVE DNA SAMPLING: PROMISE AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[41]  Len Thomas,et al.  Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size , 2009, The Journal of applied ecology.

[42]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[43]  A. T. Bergerud,et al.  Woodland caribou persistence and extirpation in relic populations on Lake Superior , 2007 .

[44]  P. Wilson,et al.  Bottlenecks, isolation, and life at the northern range limit: Peary caribou on Ellesmere Island, Canada , 2010 .

[45]  Graham Kalton,et al.  Sampling Rare Populations , 1986 .

[46]  M. Ball.  Faecal pellet size can be used to differentiate age-classes in caribou: implications for non-invasive genetic studies , 2010, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[47]  A. N. Arnason,et al.  Estimating closed population size and number of marked animals from sighting data , 1991 .

[48]  Steven R. Kingston,et al.  Characterization of target nuclear DNA from faeces reduces technical issues associated with the assumptions of low-quality and quantity template , 2007, Conservation Genetics.