Taking the “text” out of context effects in repetition priming of word identification

Repetition priming of masked word identification is reduced when initial exposure to target words is in a text rather than in a word list. We demonstrate that there is nothing special about the text context that reduces priming. In Experiment 1, target words read in normal text or in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) tex—either coherent or scrambled—produced similarly reduced priming, relative to the same words read aloud in a list. In Experiment 2, the delay was decreased between study and test for words presented in text, but they still displayed less priming than did words presented in a study list and tested after an equivalent delay. In Experiment 3, presenting study list words in RSVP to prevent reading each word aloud diminished priming to the same level as that in the text context. We conclude that presenting a target in context prevents it from being encoded and responded to as distinctively as when presented in isolation.

[1]  M. Masson,et al.  The influence of selection for response on repetition priming of word identification. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[2]  T H Carr,et al.  The level-of-focal-attention hypothesis in oral reading: influence of strategies on the context specificity of lexical repetition effects. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  P. L. Tenpenny,et al.  Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  L. Jacoby Perceptual enhancement: persistent effects of an experience. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  B. W. Whittlesea Perceptual encoding mechanisms are tricky but may be very interactive : comment on Carr, Brown, and Charalambous (1989) , 1990 .

[6]  H. Faulkner,et al.  How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer. , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  H. Roediger,et al.  Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account , 1989 .

[8]  W. Wippich Priming on verbal perceptual tests: Roles of lexical, surface, and conceptual processes , 1995, Psychological research.

[9]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Word Context During Initial Exposure Influences Degree of Priming in Word Fragment Completion , 1989 .

[10]  W. Wippich,et al.  Implicit memory for textual materials , 1995 .

[11]  Paul A Kolers,et al.  Specificity of operations in sentence recognition , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[13]  B. Levy,et al.  Transfer effects across contextual and linguistic boundaries: evidence from poor readers. , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  S. Nicolas,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual priming of individual words in coherent texts. , 1998, Memory.

[15]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[16]  B. Levy,et al.  Fluent and nonfluent forms of transfer in reading: Words and their message , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  L. Brooks,et al.  Critical influence of particular experiences in the perception of letters, words, and phrases , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Priming Patterns Are Different in Masked Word Identification and Word Fragment Completion , 1997 .

[19]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes. , 1989 .

[20]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[21]  A Pentland,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[23]  G. Oliphant Repetition And Recency Effects In Word Recognition , 1983 .

[24]  B. Cornblatt,et al.  Distractibility in schizophrenia , 1995, Psychiatry Research.

[25]  D Milech,et al.  Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[26]  T. Carr,et al.  Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive. , 1989 .

[27]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.