What Moves, the Airplane or the World?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. I. Elkind,et al. Evaluation of Aircraft Steering Displays , 1960 .
[2] W G MATHENY,et al. RELATIVE MOTION OF ELEMENTS IN INSTRUMENT DISPLAYS. , 1963, Aerospace medicine.
[3] Lawrence J. Fogel,et al. A New Concept: The Kinalog Display System , 1959 .
[4] Marianne Cruzen,et al. Tracking Performance on Combined Compensatory and Pursuit Tasks , 1952 .
[5] W. L. Carel. PICTORIAL DISPLAYS FOR FLIGHT , 1965 .
[6] Paul M Fitts,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON EQUIPMENT DESIGN , 1947 .
[7] Charles R. Kelley,et al. RELATIVE MOTION. 3. SOME RELATIVE MOTION PROBLEMS IN AVIATION , 1961 .
[8] Stanley N. Roscoe,et al. Incremental Transfer Effectiveness , 1971 .
[9] Russel F. Green,et al. Transfer Effects Between Performance on a Following Tracking Task (Modified Sam Two-Hand Coordination Test) and a Compensatory Tracking Task (Modified Sam Two-Hand Pursuit Test , 1954 .
[10] Beatrice E. Johnson,et al. OBEDIENCE TO ROTATION-INDICATING VISUAL DISPLAYS AS A FUNCTION OF CONFIDENCE IN THE DISPLAYS. , 1949 .
[11] R C Williges,et al. Simulator Motion as a Factor in Flight-Director Display Evaluation , 1973, Human factors.
[12] R W OBERMAYER,et al. Interaction of Information Displays with Control System Dynamics and Course Frequency in Continuous Tracking , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.
[13] H. P. Birmingham,et al. A comparison of pursuit and compensatory tracking under conditions of aiding and no aiding. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.
[14] Paul M. Fitts,et al. Psychological Aspects of Instrument Display. 1. Analysis of 270 'Pilot-Error' Experiences in Reading and Interpreting Aircraft Instruments , 1947 .
[15] Steven L. Johnson,et al. A New Approach to Motion Relations for Flight Director Displays. , 1971 .
[16] J. L. Harrison,et al. The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
[17] Stanley N. Roscoe,et al. Airborne Displays for Flight and Navigation , 1968 .
[18] Edgar Rubin. Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren : Studien in psychologischer Analyse , 1921 .
[19] Matheny Wg,et al. RELATIVE MOTION OF ELEMENTS IN INSTRUMENT DISPLAYS. , 1963 .
[20] S. N. Roscoe,et al. A Comparative Evaluation of a Pursuit Moving-Airplane Steering Display , 1960 .
[21] R. C. Browne. Figure and ground in a two dimensional display. , 1954 .
[22] R. Thouless. Experimental Psychology , 1939, Nature.
[23] Stanley N. Roscoe,et al. The effect of eliminating binocular and peripheral monocular visual cues upon airplane pilot performance in landing. , 1948 .
[24] E C Poulton. Bias in experimental comparisons between equipments due to the order of testing. , 1969, Ergonomics.
[25] W. F. Swartz,et al. The interaction of information displays with control system dynamics in continuous tracking. , 1961 .
[26] S N Roscoe,et al. Flight By Periscope: Making Takeoffs and Landings; The Influence of Image Magnification, Practice, and Various Conditions of Flight1 , 1966, Human factors.
[28] R. Lincoln,et al. Visual tracking: III. The instrumental dimension of motion in relation to tracking accuracy. , 1953 .
[29] G E Briggs. Learning and performance as a function of the percentage of pursuit component in a tracking display. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.
[30] John F. Gardner,et al. SPEED AND ACCURACY OF RESPONSE TO FIVE DIFFERENT ATTITUDE INDICATORS , 1954 .
[31] E. Poulton. PERCEPTUAL ANTICIPATION IN TRACKING WITH TWO-POINTER AND ONE-POINTER DISPLAYS , 1952 .