Indigenous research sovereignties: Sparking the deeper conversations we need

This editors’ introduction seeks to spark a conversation and further debate through the 14 papers and 3 commentaries comprising this special issue entitled “Indigenous Research Sovereignty.” By inviting the authors to publish in this special edition and address Indigenous Research Sovereignty from a variety of viewpoints, we have brought together a collection that inspires, transforms, and expands on the ways in which Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers are engaging with Indigenous communities to address the research agendas of communities across the globe. Through our work together over the past 8 years, the editorial team have identified eight themes within this broad concept of Indigenous Research Sovereignty. This article provides an introduction to those eight themes in the broadest strokes, while the papers and commentaries explore and refine them with significant depth. We seek to spark a conversation, we do not intend to provide answers to any of the dilemma facing Indigenous communities as they engage, or choose not to engage, in research. Our primary goal is to express an all-encompassing concern for the protection of Indigenous Communities’ inherent rights and knowledges.

[1]  Jay T. Johnson,et al.  Reciprocity: An Ethos “More Than Human” , 2023, GeoHumanities.

[2]  Melissa K. Nelson The honorable harvest of Indigenous data , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[3]  Joseph P. Brewer,et al.  Life and times of data access: Regarding Native Lands , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[4]  L. Caplins,et al.  The Piikani Well-being Project: Indigenous-led metrics and mapping to improve human and agricultural system health within the Amskapi Piikani Blackfeet Nation , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[5]  R. P. Louis Indigenous cartographies and mapping abundance , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[6]  Desna Whaanga-Schollum,et al.  Maanjiwe Nendamowinan (The Gathering of Minds): Connecting Indigenous placemakers and caring for place through co-creative research with the Toronto Islands , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[7]  Joseph P. Brewer,et al.  Toward Alaska Native research and data sovereignty: Observations and experiences from the Yukon Flats , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[8]  Te Kahuratai Moko-Painting (Ngāti Manu, Te Popoto, Ngāpuhi),et al.  (Re)emergence of Pūtaiao: Conceptualising Kaupapa Māori science , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[9]  Sākihitowin Awāsis Decolonial process tracing: Indigenous rights and pipeline resistance movements , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[10]  S. Diver,et al.  Advancing Indigenous futures with two-eyed seeing: Strategies for restoration and repair through collaborative research , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[11]  G. Garfin,et al.  Stories as data: Indigenous research sovereignty and the “Intentional Fire” podcast , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[12]  Anthony McKnight,et al.  ‘Often in between’: Thinking through research methods and Indigenous sovereignty with Yuin Country , 2023, Environment and Planning F.

[13]  Ngoc T. Phan,et al.  Decolonial subjectivities in participatory action research: Resident researcher experiences in the 2021 Guåhan Survey , 2022, Environment and Planning F.

[14]  Lorinda Riley,et al.  Wrangling the system: How tenure impacts Indigenous research , 2022, Environment and Planning F.

[15]  T. Zaman,et al.  A pragmatic approach to ethical research collaboration with Indigenous communities: A case study with the Penan people of Long Lamai, Malaysia , 2022, Environment and Planning F.

[16]  M. Forster Amplifying the influence of Māori knowledge in environmental management , 2022, Environment and Planning F.

[17]  B. Williamson,et al.  Operationalising Indigenous data sovereignty in environmental research and governance , 2022, Environment and Planning F.

[18]  Nicole S. Kuhn,et al.  Indigenous Research Ethics Requirements: An Examination of Six Tribal Institutional Review Board Applications and Processes in the United States , 2020, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[19]  Sweeney Windchief,et al.  Applying Indigenous Research Methods , 2019 .

[20]  Jay T. Johnson,et al.  Being Together in Place: Indigenous Coexistence in a More Than Human World , 2017 .

[21]  E. Toombs,et al.  Indigenous Research Methods: A Systematic Review , 2017 .

[22]  D. Hikuroa Mātauranga Māori—the ūkaipō of knowledge in New Zealand , 2017 .

[23]  Jay T. Johnson,et al.  Weaving Indigenous and Sustainability Sciences: Diversifying our Methods (WIS2DOM) Workshop , 2014 .

[24]  Jay T. Johnson,et al.  Indigenous geographies III , 2014 .

[25]  Sarah Hunt,et al.  Ontologies of Indigeneity: the politics of embodying a concept , 2014 .

[26]  H. Castleden,et al.  “I spent the first year drinking tea”: Exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on community‐based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples , 2012 .

[27]  Melinda TankardReist Can you hear us now , 2010 .

[28]  Shawn Wilson Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods , 2008 .

[29]  Renee Pualani Louis,et al.  Can You Hear us Now? Voices from the Margin: Using Indigenous Methodologies in Geographic Research , 2007 .

[30]  D. Brugge,et al.  Protecting the Navajo people through tribal regulation of research , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[31]  Roberts,et al.  The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien , 2019 .

[32]  Gregory Cajete,et al.  Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence , 1999 .