Avatar culture: cross-cultural evaluations of avatar facial expressions

Avatars are increasingly used to express our emotions in our online communications. Such avatars are used based on the assumption that avatar expressions are interpreted universally among all cultures. This paper investigated cross-cultural evaluations of avatar expressions designed by Japanese and Western designers. The goals of the study were: (1) to investigate cultural differences in avatar expression evaluation and apply findings from psychological studies of human facial expression recognition, (2) to identify expressions and design features that cause cultural differences in avatar facial expression interpretation. The results of our study confirmed that (1) there are cultural differences in interpreting avatars’ facial expressions, and the psychological theory that suggests physical proximity affects facial expression recognition accuracy is also applicable to avatar facial expressions, (2) positive expressions have wider cultural variance in interpretation than negative ones, (3) use of gestures and gesture marks may sometimes cause counter-effects in recognizing avatar facial expressions.

[1]  Richard W. Brislin,et al.  Cross-Cultural Research in Psychology , 1983 .

[2]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[3]  Tomodo Koda.  Interpretation of Emotionally Expressive Characters in an Intercultural Communication , 2004, KES.

[4]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Cultural Similarity's Consequences , 2003 .

[6]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  When familiarity breeds accuracy: cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Yumiko Mori.  Atoms of Bonding: Communication Components Bridging Children Worldwide (Invited Talk) , 2007, IWIC.

[8]  M. Cranach,et al.  Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline. , 1982 .

[9]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Helper agent: designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space , 2000, CHI.

[10]  Steven M. Drucker,et al.  The social life of small graphical chat spaces , 2000, CHI.

[11]  J. P. Foley,et al.  Gesture and Environment , 1942 .

[12]  P. Ekman.  Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life , 2003 .

[13]  William C. Schmidt,et al.  World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions , 1997 .

[14]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Culturally-Situated Pictogram Retrieval , 2007, IWIC.

[15]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[16]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  The Web Experiment Method , 2000 .

[17]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2013 .

[18]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Cross-cultural study of expressive avatars , 2004 .

[19]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Culture and Computers: A Review of the Concept of Culture and Implications for Intercultural Collaborative Online Learning , 2007, IWIC.

[20]  Toyoaki Nishida,et al.  Culture-Specific First Meeting Encounters between Virtual Agents , 2008, IVA.

[21]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[22]  Toyoaki Nishida,et al.  Enculturating conversational interfaces by socio-cultural aspects of communication , 2008, IUI '08.

[23]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[24]  Toshiyuki Takasaki,et al.  Design and Development of a Pictogram Communication System for Children Around the World , 2007, IWIC.

[25]  David Salesin,et al.  Comic Chat , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[26]  Per Persson,et al.  Exms: an animated and avatar-based messaging system for expressive peer communication , 2003, GROUP.