Assessment of the effects of body weight unloading on overground gait biomechanical parameters.

BACKGROUND Gait rehabilitation with body weight unloading is a common method of gait rehabilitation for clinical subjects with neurological and musculoskeletal impairments. However, the efficiency of this method was hard to assess given the confounding variables walking modality (treadmill vs. overground) and subjects' inability to maintain a comfortable speed when pulling a body weight unloading system by which they were suspended. By controlling the gait modality (overground) and devising a mechanical device that pulled the system at a constant speed, this study could examine the unique effects of body weight unloading on the biomechanical parameters of healthy subjects walking overground at comfortable speed. METHODS Ten healthy subjects were instructed to walk overground under a control (no suspension vest) and three (0%, 15%, 30%) body weight unloading experimental conditions. Hip, knee and ankle spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic measures were recorded for all conditions (six trials per condition). FINDINGS ANOVA showed no changes in cadence, speed and stride length, a reduction in double limb support and increase in single limb support. Pairwise comparisons of gait parameters under 0%,15% and 30% body weight unloading conditions indicated significant reductions in lower joint kinematics and kinetics with increased body weight unloading. Additionally, despite changes in the peak values of kinematic and kinetic measures, the curvature patterns remained unchanged. INTERPRETATION This study shows that overground gait with up to 30% body weight unloading reduces joint loads without modifying gait curvature patterns or the plantarflexion angle. Several clinical applications for gait reeducation conducted in situ with unloading are enumerated.

[1]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Data analysis 2 , 2016 .

[2]  P A Dieppe,et al.  Yet more evidence that osteoarthritis is not a cartilage disease , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  M. Maležič,et al.  Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  V. Dietz Body weight supported gait training: From laboratory to clinical setting , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[5]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful , 2007, Stroke.

[6]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[7]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  The role of ankle plantar flexor muscle work during walking. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  Murray Mp,et al.  Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Lewek The influence of body weight support on ankle mechanics during treadmill walking. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: a critical review of intervention approaches. , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[13]  R. Müller,et al.  Modulation of leg muscle activity and gait kinematics by walking speed and bodyweight unloading. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[14]  Nobuhiro Kito,et al.  Contribution of knee adduction moment impulse to pain and disability in Japanese women with medial knee osteoarthritis. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  M. Pierrynowski Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals , 2009 .

[16]  A. Joseph Threlkeld,et al.  Temporospatial and kinematic gait alterations during treadmill walking with body weight suspension. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[17]  Strategies for clinical motion analysis based on functional decomposition of the gait cycle. , 2002, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[18]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Progress in Motor Control , 2016, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[19]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Alfred D. Grant Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[21]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[22]  J. Donelan,et al.  Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches , 2008 .

[24]  Najia Shakoor,et al.  The biomechanics of osteoarthritis: Implications for therapy , 2009, Current rheumatology reports.

[25]  S. Stanhope,et al.  Sensitivity of joint moments to changes in walking speed and body-weight-support are interdependent and vary across joints. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  A. R. Gonçalves,et al.  Características cinemáticas, cinéticas e eletromiográficas do andar de adultos jovens com e sem suporte parcial de peso corporal , 2007 .

[27]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Gait mechanics influence healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  F. Haas,et al.  Mechanical unweighting effects on treadmill exercise and pain in elderly people with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[29]  A. Gonçalves,et al.  KINEMATIC, KINETIC AND ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUNG ADULTS WALKING WITH AND WITHOUT PARTIAL BODY WEIGHT SUPPORT , 2008 .

[30]  José A Barela,et al.  The use of body weight support on ground level: an alternative strategy for gait training of individuals with stroke , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  Stefan Hesse,et al.  Treadmill Training with Partial Body Weight Support: Influence of Body Weight Release on the Gait of Hemiparetic Patients , 1997 .

[32]  J. Fung,et al.  Faster Is Better: Implications for Speed-Intensive Gait Training After Stroke , 2004, Stroke.

[33]  D. Felson,et al.  Weight Loss Reduces the Risk for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in Women , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[35]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Motor Control Programs and Walking , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[36]  Gerald F. Harris,et al.  Human motion analysis : current applications and future directions , 1996 .

[37]  E. Chao,et al.  Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  T. Dawber,et al.  The Framingham Study , 2014 .

[39]  F. Alton,et al.  A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.