Recognition Requirements for the Activation, Differentiation and Function of T‐Helper Cells Specific for Class I MHC Alloantigens

The present review has focused on the specificity of the T-helper cell populations initiating MHC class I alloreactions. In contrast to conventional immune responses against soluble antigens, responses against membrane-bound class I alloantigens are initiated by two distinct antigen-specific T-helper cell populations that can be distinguished by their Lyt phenotype, MHC restriction specificity, antigen specificity, and requirement for thymically determined self-recognition. Alloresponses were shown to be a composite consisting of two distinct components: one mediated by L3T4+ Th cells and very similar to conventional self + X responses; and one mediated by Lyt2+ Th cells and unique to alloresponses against MHC class I antigens. As would befit an unusual Th cell population, the recognition/response spectrum of Lyt2+ Th cells was highly unusual and was found to be the basis for much of the uniqueness we attribute to immune alloreactions, including rapid rejection of tissue allografts in vivo.

[1]  G. Shearer,et al.  Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the prevention of lupus-like disease occurring in a murine model of graft-vs-host disease. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[2]  A. Singer,et al.  Phenotype, specificity, and function of T cell subsets and T cell interactions involved in skin allograft rejection , 1987, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  A. Singer,et al.  Graft-vs-host reaction limited to a class II MHC difference results in a selective deficiency in L3T4+ but not in Lyt-2+ T helper cell function. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[4]  A. Singer,et al.  Relationship among function, phenotype, and specificity in primary allospecific T cell populations: identification of phenotypically identical but functionally distinct primary T cell subsets that differ in their recognition of MHC class I and class II allodeterminants. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[5]  L. Hood,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocytes from mice with soluble class I Q10 molecules in their serum are not tolerant to membrane-bound Q10. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[6]  K. Gould,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognize influenza haemagglutinin that lacks a signal sequence , 1986, Nature.

[7]  A. Singer,et al.  Differential helper and effector responses of Lyt-2+ T cells to H-2Kb mutant (Kbm) determinants and the appearance of thymic influence on anti-Kbm CTL responsiveness. , 1986, Journal of immunology.

[8]  R. Redfield,et al.  A model for the selective loss of major histocompatibility complex self-restricted T cell immune responses during the development of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). , 1986, Journal of immunology.

[9]  J. Sprent,et al.  Properties of purified T cell subsets. II. In vivo responses to class I vs. class II H-2 differences , 1986, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  T. Braciale,et al.  Differences in antigen presentation to MHC class I-and class II- restricted influenza virus-specific cytolytic T lymphocyte clones , 1986, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[11]  A. McMichael,et al.  The epitopes of influenza nucleoprotein recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be defined with short synthetic peptides , 1986, Cell.

[12]  T. Malek,et al.  Characterization of two distinct primary T cell populations that secrete interleukin 2 upon recognition of class I or class II major histocompatibility antigens , 1986, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  J. Sprent,et al.  Properties of purified T cell subsets. I. In vitro responses to class I vs. class II H-2 alloantigens , 1985, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  A. Singer,et al.  Specificity, phenotype, and precursor frequency of primary cytolytic T lymphocytes specific for class II major histocompatibility antigens. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[15]  A. Singer,et al.  Characterization of antigen-specific, Ia-restricted, L3T4+ cytolytic T lymphocytes and assessment of thymic influence on their self specificity , 1985, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  L. Glimcher,et al.  Both L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ helper T cells initiate cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses against allogenic major histocompatibility antigens but not against trinitrophenyl-modified self , 1985, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  A. Singer,et al.  Role of accessory cell processing and presentation of shed H-2 alloantigens in allospecific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[18]  A. Singer,et al.  T cell-accessory cell interactions that initiate allospecific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses: existence of both Ia-restricted and Ia-unrestricted cellular interaction pathways. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[19]  A. Singer,et al.  Self recognition of accessory cell Ia determinants is required for the in vitro generation of hapten-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. , 1983, Journal of immunology.

[20]  E. Shevach,et al.  Identification and initial characterization of a rat monoclonal antibody reactive with the murine interleukin 2 receptor-ligand complex. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  K. A. Wall,et al.  Characterization of the Murine Antigenic Determinant, Designated L3T4a, Recognized by Monoclonal Antibody GK 1.5: Expression of L3T4a by Functional T Cell Clones Appears to Correlate Primarily with Class II MHC Antigen‐Reactivity , 1983, Immunological reviews.

[22]  A. Singer,et al.  Differences in the MHC-restricted self-recognition repertoire of intra-thymic and extra-thymic cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors. , 1983, Journal of immunology.

[23]  A. Singer,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in allogeneic radiation bone marrow chimeras. The chimeric host strictly dictates the self-repertoire of Ia- restricted T cells but not H-2K/D-restricted T cells , 1982, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  A. Singer,et al.  T cells from fully H-2 allogeneic (A replaced by B) radiation bone marrow chimeras are functionally competent and host restricted but are alloreactive against hybrid Ia determinants expressed on (A x B)F1 cells , 1982, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  A. Singer,et al.  Self recognition in allogeneic thymic chimeras. Self recognition by T helper cells from thymus-engrafted nude mice is restricted to the thymic H-2 haplotype , 1982, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  F. Bach,et al.  Antigen-driven helper cell-independent cloned cytolytic T lymphocytes , 1981, Nature.

[27]  T. Springer,et al.  A shared alloantigenic determinant on Ia antigens encoded by the I-A and I-E subregions: evidence for I region gene duplication. , 1981, Journal of immunology.

[28]  A. Singer,et al.  The H-2 phenotype of the thymus dictates the self-specificity expressed by thymic but not splenic cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors in thymus-engrafted nude mice. , 1981, Journal of immunology.

[29]  A. Singer,et al.  Self recognition in allogeneic radiation bone marrow chimeras. A radiation- resistant host element dictates the self specificity and immune response gene phenotype of T-helper cells , 1981, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[30]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  Cellular interactions in the generation of cytolytic T lymphocyte responses: role of Ia-positive splenic adherent cells in presentation in H-2 antigen. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  C. Pettinelli,et al.  Cell types required for H-2-restricted cytotoxic responses generated by trinitrobenzene sulfonate-modified syngeneic cells or trinitrophenyl-conjugated proteins. , 1979, Journal of immunology.

[32]  M. Bevan Killer cells reactive to altered-self antigens can also be alloreactive. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  E. Shevach Alternative pathways for T lymphocyte activation. , 1989, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[34]  K. Heeg,et al.  Identification of interleukin 2‐producing T helper cells within murine Lyt‐2+ T lymphocytes: frequency, specificity and clonal segregation from Lyt‐2+ precursors of cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1987, European journal of immunology.

[35]  A. Singer,et al.  Analysis of T-cell subsets in rejection of Kb mutant skin allografts differing at class I MHC , 1986, Nature.

[36]  J. Geliebter,et al.  Murine major histocompatibility complex class-I mutants: molecular analysis and structure-function implications. , 1986, Annual review of immunology.

[37]  A. Guimezanes,et al.  Inhibition of helper function with anti‐Lyt‐2 or anti‐L3T4 monoclonal antibodies depending on stimulating antigens , 1985, European journal of immunology.

[38]  A. Singer,et al.  Mechanisms of T cell-B cell interaction. , 1983, Annual review of immunology.

[39]  L. Herzenberg,et al.  Properties of monoclonal antibodies to mouse Ig allotypes, H-2, and Ia antigens. , 1978, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[40]  R. Germain,et al.  Cytolytic thymus-derived lymphocytes specific for allogeneic stimulator cells crossreact with chemically modified syngeneic cells. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  N. K. Jerne,et al.  The somatic generation of immune recognition , 1971, European journal of immunology.