Where people look for online health information

OBJECTIVES To identify health-related websites Americans are using, demographic characteristics associated with certain website type and how website type shapes users' online information seeking experiences. METHODS Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 4 Cycle 1 were used. User-identified websites were categorised into four types: government sponsored, commercially based, academically affiliated and search engines. Logistic regression analyses examined associations between users' sociodemographic characteristics and website type, and associations between website type and information search experience. RESULTS Respondents reported using: commercial websites (71.8%), followed by a search engines (11.6%), academically affiliated sites (11.1%) and government-sponsored websites (5.5%). Older age was associated with the use of academic websites (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02, 1.04); younger age with commercial website use (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.98). Search engine use predicted increased levels of frustration, effort and concern over website information quality, while commercial website use predicted decreased levels of these same measures. DISCUSSION Health information seekers experience varying levels of frustration, effort and concern related to their online searching. CONCLUSION There is a need for continued efforts by librarians and health care professionals to train seekers of online health information to select websites using established guidelines and quality criteria.

[1]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[2]  L. Aspinwall Rethinking the Role of Positive Affect in Self-Regulation , 1998 .

[3]  Jonathan Marshall,et al.  The impact of displayed awards on the credibility and retention of Web site information , 2000, AMIA.

[4]  Michael Peterson,et al.  A Comparative Features Analysis of Publicly Accessible Commercial and Government Health Database Web Sites , 2001 .

[5]  A. Isen,et al.  An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations: Theoretical Issues With Practical Implications , 2001 .

[6]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Positive attitudes and failed queries: an exploration of the conundrums of consumer health information retrieval , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Janet Morahan-Martin,et al.  How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural Review , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  Qing Zeng-Treitler,et al.  Research Paper: Assisting Consumer Health Information Retrieval with Query Recommendations , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences , 2006 .

[10]  Rukhsana Ahmed,et al.  The effect of source credibility on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet , 2006, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[11]  Elizabeth Sillence,et al.  A framework for understanding trust factors in web-based health advice , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  M. Kiviniemi,et al.  How do I feel about the behavior? The interplay of affective associations with behaviors and cognitive beliefs as influences on physical activity behavior. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  S. Lambert,et al.  Health Information—Seeking Behavior , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[15]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[16]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[17]  R. Merrell,et al.  The authority and utility of Internet information. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  Lisa Gualtieri,et al.  The Internet as a Health Information Source: Findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and Implications for Health Communication , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[19]  Ardion Beldad,et al.  How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Enmanuel A. Chavarria,et al.  eHealth Literacy Among College Students: A Systematic Review With Implications for eHealth Education , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Daqing He,et al.  The Visibility of Health Web Portals for teens: a Hyperlink Analysis , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..

[22]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  Perceived Threat and Corroboration: Key Factors That Improve a Predictive Model of Trust in Internet-based Health Information and Advice , 2011, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[23]  A. V. van Deursen,et al.  Internet Skills Performance Tests: Are People Ready for eHealth? , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Yanchun Liang,et al.  User experience evaluation of Google search for obtaining medical knowledge: a case study , 2011, Int. J. Data Min. Bioinform..

[25]  John Willinsky,et al.  Public Access and Use of Health Research: An Exploratory Study of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy Using Interviews and Surveys of Health Personnel , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  Hyojin Kim,et al.  Online health information search and evaluation: observations and semi-structured interviews with college students and maternal health experts. , 2011, Health information and libraries journal.

[27]  Agne Suziedelyte,et al.  How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals' demand for health care services? , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[28]  Yanchun Liang,et al.  Using Internet Search Engines to Obtain Medical Information: A Comparative Study , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[29]  Lorraine R. Buis,et al.  The state of e-commerce in health: An examination, diagnosis, and prognosis , 2013 .

[30]  P. Spreeuwenberg,et al.  The Relationship Between Health, Education, and Health Literacy: Results From the Dutch Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey , 2013, Journal of health communication.

[31]  Darja Groselj,et al.  A webometric analysis of online health information: sponsorship, platform type and link structures , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[32]  J. V. van Weert,et al.  Low Health Literacy and Evaluation of Online Health Information: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2015, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[33]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Quality of health information for consumers on the web: A systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  E. Sillence,et al.  Trust and engagement in online health: a timeline approach , 2015 .

[35]  J. Burkell,et al.  Could we do better? Behavioural tracking on recommended consumer health websites. , 2015, Health information and libraries journal.

[36]  Matthew Manierre,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Flexible Resources and Health Information Channel Selection , 2016, Health communication.