Augmented social cognition: using social web technology to enhance the ability of groups to remember, think, and reason

We are experiencing a new Social Web, where people share, communicate, commiserate, and conflict with each other. As evidenced by systems like Wikipedia, twitter, and delicious.com, these environments are turning people into social information foragers and sharers. Groups interact to resolve conflicts and jointly make sense of topic areas from "Obama vs. Clinton" to "Islam." PARC's Augmented Social Cognition researchers -- who come from cognitive psychology, computer science, HCI, CSCW, and other disciplines -- focus on understanding how to "enhance a group of people's ability to remember, think, and reason". Through Social Web systems like social bookmarking sites, blogs, Wikis, and more, we can finally study, in detail, these types of enhancements on a very large scale. Here we summarize recent work and early findings such as: (1) how conflict and coordination have played out in Wikipedia, and how social transparency might affect reader trust; (2) how decreasing interaction costs might change participation in social tagging systems; and (3) how computation can help organize user-generated content and metadata.

[1]  Julian Dibbell,et al.  A Rape in Cyberspace , 2009 .

[2]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Ed Huai-hsin Chi,et al.  Annotate once, appear anywhere: collective foraging for snippets of interest using paragraph fingerprinting , 2009, CHI.

[4]  J. Voß Measuring Wikipedia , 2005 .

[5]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  SparTag.us: a low cost tagging system for foraging of web content , 2008, AVI '08.

[6]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory , 2008, ICWSM.

[7]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why do tagging systems work? , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search and HCI: designing and evaluating interfaces to support exploratory search interaction , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Augmented information assimilation: social and algorithmic web aids for the information long tail , 2008, CHI.

[10]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible , 2002, CACM.

[11]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk , 2008, CHI.

[12]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia , 2007, CHI.

[13]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard , 2008, CHI.

[14]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Wikipedia risks , 2005, CACM.

[15]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Can you ever trust a wiki?: impacting perceived trustworthiness in wikipedia , 2008, CSCW.

[16]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Towards a model of understanding social search , 2008, SSM '08.

[17]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Signpost from the masses: learning effects in an exploratory social tag search browser , 2009, CHI.

[18]  Pavel Curtis,et al.  Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. , 1997 .

[19]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Anatomy of a flame: conflict and community building on the Internet , 1995 .

[20]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Answer Garden 2: merging organizational memory with collaborative help , 1996, CSCW '96.

[21]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  With a little help from my friends: examining the impact of social annotations in sensemaking tasks , 2009, CHI.