Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome.

[1]  U. Khot,et al.  Prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-St-elevation acute coronary syndromes the enduring value of Killip classification , 2004 .

[2]  D. Morrow New insight into clinical risk scores for patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2003, American heart journal.

[3]  B. Gersh,et al.  Association of the PURSUIT risk score with predischarge ejection fraction, angiographic severity of coronary artery disease, and mortality in a nonselected, community-based population with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, American heart journal.

[4]  Bertram L Kasiske,et al.  Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. , 2003, Hypertension.

[5]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  E. Topol,et al.  Prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the enduring value of Killip classification. , 2003, JAMA.

[7]  C. Gross,et al.  Validity of a Simple ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Index: Are Randomized Trial Prognostic Estimates Generalizable to Elderly Patients? , 2003, Circulation.

[8]  Mandeep Singh,et al.  Scores for Post–Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification in the Community , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  W. Weintraub Prediction scores after myocardial infarction: value, limitations, and future directions. , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Abnormalities in Renal Function in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2002, Circulation.

[12]  E. Antman,et al.  Validation of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score for unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the TIMI III registry. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  E. Antman,et al.  An integrated clinical approach to predicting the benefit of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Application of the TIMI Risk Score for UA/NSTEMI in PRISM-PLUS. , 2002, European heart journal.

[14]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  A. Go,et al.  The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Predicting one-year mortality among elderly survivors of hospitalization for an acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Grace Investigators,et al.  Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, American heart journal.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  Cardiac troponin I for stratification of early outcomes and the efficacy of enoxaparin in unstable angina: a TIMI-11B substudy. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  J. Yee,et al.  Risks associated with renal dysfunction in patients in the coronary care unit. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  K. Lee,et al.  Prediction of 1-year survival after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction in the global utilization of streptokinase and TPA for occluded coronary arteries trial. , 2000, Circulation.

[24]  D. Jacobs,et al.  PREDICT: A simple risk score for clinical severity and long-term prognosis after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina: the Minnesota heart survey. , 1999, Circulation.

[25]  C. Heeschen,et al.  Benefit of abciximab in patients with refractory unstable angina in relation to serum troponin T levels. c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE) Study Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. , 1999, JAMA.

[27]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[28]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[29]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.