A case study in organisational change: implications for theory

Organisational change is typically conceptualised as moving from the status quo to a new, desired, configuration to better match the environment. Change could, therefore, be seen as a departure from the norm, or alternatively as normal and simply a natural response to environmental and internal conditions. Static models of organisations are being displaced by dynamic models, which reflect the discontinuous nature of organisational change. Developments in theory suggest limitations to contingency approaches, which carry the assumptions of static models of change. Analysis of this case at PowerCo in Australia reveals a number of issues related to changes aimed at achieving a more commercial, profit‐oriented, focus. Points out that the contextualist approach is holistic, in which these aspects interact with each other as change unfolds temporally. A contextualist framework permits models of change to be visualised as dynamic rather than static, having a temporal setting which has multiple causes acting as loops rather than simple lines. This enables change to be understood as a discontinuous phenomenon having the benefits, without the limitations, of rational contingency models.

[1]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[2]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  M. Jelinek Managing change for competitive success , 1993 .

[4]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[5]  A. Pettigrew Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[6]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Understanding Organizational Transformation Using a Dissipative Structure Model , 1989 .

[7]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  What Machines Can't Do , 1994 .

[8]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Transforming the practice of management , 1993 .

[9]  M. Brand,et al.  Regulation analysis of energy metabolism. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[11]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution , 1986 .

[12]  N. Tichy Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics , 1985 .

[13]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Organizational change : a processual approach , 1994 .

[14]  K. Boulding General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[16]  Frank C. Mahncke,et al.  The First World War , 2000 .

[17]  M. Brand,et al.  Top down metabolic control analysis. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  P. Wright The Social Psychology of Organizations, (2nd Ed): Daniel Katz and Robert L. Kahn New York: Wiley, 1978, 838 pp. , 1979 .

[19]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[20]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[21]  Peter J. Dowling,et al.  Electricity industry reform: a case analysis in Australia , 1998 .

[22]  L. Bertalanffy The theory of open systems in physics and biology. , 1950 .

[23]  J. H. Davis,et al.  TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[24]  A. Peshkin The Goodness of Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[25]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[26]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns , 1991 .

[27]  P. Senge The leader's new work: Building learning organizations. , 1998 .

[28]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[29]  G. Lippitt,et al.  Implementing organizational change , 1985 .

[30]  W. French,et al.  Organization development : behavioral science interventions for organization improvement , 1999 .

[31]  Dave Ulrich,et al.  Organizational capability: creating competitive advantage , 1991 .

[32]  E. Schein Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies. , 1996 .

[33]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Structure of Organizations. , 1971 .

[34]  P. Grinyer Book reviewThe awakening giant: Continuity and change at ICI : Andrew W. Pettigrew, Basil Blackwell (1985), 519 pp. £25.00 (hardback) , 1986 .

[35]  Dexter C. Dunphy,et al.  Under new management: Australian organizations in transition , 1991 .

[36]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[37]  Aynsley J. Kellow Transforming Power: The Politics of Electricity Planning , 1995 .

[38]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[39]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[40]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Organizational Design Types, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic Change , 1988 .

[41]  A. Pettigrew The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research , 1992 .

[42]  P. Dawson Beyond Conventional Change Models: A Processual Perspective , 1996 .

[43]  James W. Fairfield-Sonn,et al.  The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. , 1987 .

[44]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[45]  S. Hawking A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes , 1988 .

[46]  Colin Eden,et al.  Action research for the study of organizations , 1996 .

[47]  D. Stace,et al.  Beyond the Boundaries: Leading and RE-Creating the Successful Enterprise , 1994 .