Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: a Construction Grammar perspective

This article describes and analyses five different ways of expressing futurity in English ( shall/will, be going to, be to , the simple present and the present progressive) in a Construction Grammar framework. It suggests that the different expressions can be captured as an onomasiologically motivated family of constructions in which the single constructions are differentiated by complex co- and contextual configurations. The latter can be elegantly captured in a Construction Grammar framework since constructions by definition can include pragmatic features. Also, this article claims that constructions may be equipped with an additional ‘context slot’, in which co- and contextual information can be stored. In a final section, this article turns to the issue of tense as a grammatical phenomenon and its genesis in grammaticalisation processes. It is suggested that a Construction Grammar account can make the age-old debate about a future tense in English redundant. Instead, it complements studies in grammaticalisation and opens up some interesting perspectives on parallel developments in the onto- and phylogenesis of constructions.

[1]  J. Gee An Interpretive Approach to the Study of Modality: What Child Language can Tell the Linguist , 1985 .

[2]  R. Lakoff,et al.  Tense and Its Relation to Participants , 1970 .

[3]  Laura A. Michaelis Aspectual grammar and past-time reference , 1998 .

[4]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[5]  F. Palmer The English Verb , 1974 .

[6]  M. Tomasello Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[7]  Raymond Hickey,et al.  Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on His 60th Birthday , 1999 .

[8]  J. Coates The semantics of the modal auxiliaries , 1983 .

[9]  D. Hymes Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1974 .

[10]  Hubert Cuyckens,et al.  Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics , 2003 .

[11]  Adrienne Lehrer,et al.  Frames, Fields, and Contrasts : New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization , 1992 .

[12]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Meaning and the English Verb , 1971 .

[13]  Jan-Ola Östman,et al.  Handbook of Pragmatics , 2018, Handbook of Pragmatics.

[14]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[15]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Aspect shift and coercion , 1998 .

[16]  Alexander Bergs,et al.  Constructions and constructs:mapping a shift between predication and attribution , 2008 .

[17]  W. Bruce Croft Radical Construction Grammar , 2001 .

[18]  Alexander Bergs,et al.  Constructions and language change , 2008 .

[19]  F. Palmer,et al.  Mood and modality , 1986 .

[20]  I. T. V. Ostade I will be drowned and no man shall save me’: The conventional rules for shall and will in eighteenth‐century English grammars∗ , 1985 .

[21]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  Corpus Linguistics and the Web , 2006 .

[22]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[23]  Debra Ziegeler,et al.  A word of caution on coercion , 2007 .

[24]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[25]  Dirk Geeraerts,et al.  Towards a pragmatic model of cognitive onomasiology , 2003 .

[26]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions , 2004 .

[27]  J. Gerhardt,et al.  The use of the simple present in the speech of two three-year-olds: Normativity not subjectivity , 1986, Language in Society.

[28]  Stefan Thomas Gries,et al.  Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement , 2003 .

[29]  Tania Kuteva,et al.  On identifying an evasive gram : Action narrowly averted , 1998 .

[30]  M. Shatz,et al.  Perspectives on language and thought: Constraints on the acquisition of English modals , 1991 .

[31]  K. Bardovi-Harlig Tense and aspect in second language acquisition : form, meaning, and use , 2000 .

[32]  Iskender Savasir,et al.  On the use of will and gonna: Toward a description of activity‐types for child language∗ , 1985 .

[33]  Paul Larreya Modal Verbs and the Expression of Futurity in English, French and Italian , 2000 .

[34]  S. Fleischman The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance , 1982 .

[35]  G. Pullum,et al.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2002 .

[36]  Nadja Nesselhauf Diachronic analysis with the internet? Will and shall in ARCHER and in a corpus of e-texts from the web , 2007 .

[37]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[39]  Ylva Berglund,et al.  Utilising Present-day English corpora: a case-study concerning expressions of future , 2000 .

[40]  O. Jespersen A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .

[41]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[42]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  As Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar , 1990 .

[43]  Paul Kay,et al.  Words and the grammar of context , 1997, CSLI lecture notes series.

[44]  Simeon Potter,et al.  The English Verb: Form and Meanings , 1966 .

[45]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi Be Going to Versus Will/Shall , 2003 .

[46]  James P. Byrnes,et al.  Perspectives on language and thought : interrelations in development , 1991 .

[47]  C. Atance,et al.  'Maybe my daddy give me a big piano': the development of children's use of modals to express uncertainty , 2000 .

[48]  Mirjam Fried,et al.  Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective , 2004 .

[49]  Bert Cappelle,et al.  The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis , 2006 .