Determination of zenith hydrostatic delay and its impact on GNSS-derived integrated water vapor

Abstract. Surface pressure is a necessary meteorological variable for the accurate determination of integrated water vapor (IWV) using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The lack of pressure observations is a big issue for the conversion of historical GNSS observations, which is a relatively new area of GNSS applications in climatology. Hence the use of the surface pressure derived from either a blind model (e.g., Global Pressure and Temperature 2 wet, GPT2w) or a global atmospheric reanalysis (e.g., ERA-Interim) becomes an important alternative solution. In this study, pressure derived from these two methods is compared against the pressure observed at 108 global GNSS stations at four epochs (00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00 UTC) each day for the period 2000–2013. Results show that a good accuracy is achieved from the GPT2w-derived pressure in the latitude band between −30 and 30° and the average value of 6 h root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) across all the stations in this region is 2.5 hPa. Correspondingly, an error of 5.8 mm and 0.9 kg m−2 in its resultant zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) and IWV is expected. However, for the stations located in the mid-latitude bands between −30 and −60° and between 30 and 60°, the mean value of the RMSEs is 7.3 hPa, and for the stations located in the high-latitude bands from −60 to −90° and from 60 to 90°, the mean value of the RMSEs is 9.9 hPa. The mean of the RMSEs of the ERA-Interim-derived pressure across at the selected 100 stations is 0.9 hPa, which will lead to an equivalent error of 2.1 mm and 0.3 kg m−2 in the ZHD and IWV, respectively, determined from this ERA-Interim-derived pressure. Results also show that the monthly IWV determined using pressure from ERA-Interim has a good accuracy − with a relative error of better than 3 % on a global scale; thus, the monthly IWV resulting from ERA-Interim-derived pressure has the potential to be used for climate studies, whilst the monthly IWV resulting from GPT2w-derived pressure has a relative error of 6.7 % in the mid-latitude regions and even reaches 20.8 % in the high-latitude regions. The comparison between GPT2w and seasonal models of pressure–ZHD derived from ERA-Interim and pressure observations indicates that GPT2w captures the seasonal variations in pressure–ZHD very well.

[1]  Tobias Nilsson,et al.  Long-term trends in the atmospheric water vapor content estimated from ground-based GPS data , 2008 .

[2]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  Accuracy assessment of water vapour measurements from in situ and remote sensing techniques during the DEMEVAP 2011 campaign at OHP , 2013 .

[3]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Variability of GPS derived water vapor and comparison with MODIS data over the Indo-Gangetic plains , 2013 .

[4]  Matthias Schneider,et al.  Continuous quality assessment of atmospheric water vapour measurement techniques: FTIR, Cimel, MFRSR, GPS, and Vaisala RS92 , 2010 .

[5]  Maorong Ge,et al.  Real‐time GPS sensing of atmospheric water vapor: Precise point positioning with orbit, clock, and phase delay corrections , 2014 .

[6]  T. Nilsson,et al.  GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques , 2013, Geophysical research letters.

[7]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  Comparison of Measurements of Atmospheric Wet Delay by Radiosonde, Water Vapor Radiometer, GPS, and VLBI , 2001 .

[8]  Z. Pu,et al.  Examination of Errors in Near-Surface Temperature and Wind from WRF Numerical Simulations in Regions of Complex Terrain , 2013 .

[9]  T. Herring,et al.  GPS Meteorology: Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Water Vapor Using the Global Positioning System , 1992 .

[10]  H. Schuh,et al.  Atmospheric Effects in Space Geodesy , 2013 .

[11]  Yingyan Cheng,et al.  Water vapor‐weighted mean temperature and its impact on the determination of precipitable water vapor and its linear trend , 2016 .

[12]  O. Tetens,et al.  Uber einige meteorologische begriffe , 1930 .

[13]  Laura Fernández,et al.  Multi-year GNSS monitoring of atmospheric IWV over Central and South America for climate studies , 2016 .

[14]  The Concept of Operational Near Real-Time GNSS Meteorology System for Atmospheric Water Vapour Monitoring over Peninsular Malaysia , 2015 .

[15]  Gunnar Elgered,et al.  Geodesy by radio interferometry - Water vapor radiometry for estimation of the wet delay , 1991 .

[16]  Frank Kleijer,et al.  Troposphere Modeling and Filtering for Precise GPS Leveling , 2004 .

[17]  O. Bock,et al.  Verification of NWP Model Analyses and Radiosonde Humidity Data with GPS Precipitable Water Vapor Estimates during AMMA , 2009 .

[18]  Eric Pottiaux,et al.  Review of the state of the art and future prospects of the ground-based GNSS meteorology in Europe , 2016 .

[19]  Witold Rohm,et al.  Multi-observation meteorological and GNSS data comparison with Numerical Weather Prediction model , 2015 .

[20]  Yibin Yao,et al.  A globally applicable, season-specific model for estimating the weighted mean temperature of the atmosphere , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[21]  Robert Weber,et al.  Development of an improved empirical model for slant delays in the troposphere (GPT2w) , 2015, GPS Solutions.

[22]  Junhong Wang,et al.  A near-global, 2-hourly data set of atmospheric precipitable water from ground-based GPS measurements , 2007 .

[23]  Gunnar Elgered,et al.  Trends in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content From Ground-Based GPS: The Impact of the Elevation Cutoff Angle , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[24]  I. Shapiro,et al.  Geodesy by radio interferometry: Effects of atmospheric modeling errors on estimates of baseline length , 1985 .

[25]  Rebecca J. Ross,et al.  Estimating mean weighted temperature of the atmosphere for Global Positioning System applications , 1997 .

[26]  H. Schuh,et al.  Short Note: A global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications , 2007 .

[27]  Shuanggen Jin,et al.  Variability and Climatology of PWV From Global 13-Year GPS Observations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Stephen E. Cohn,et al.  Treatment of Observation Error due to Unresolved Scales in Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 2006 .

[29]  J. Saastamoinen.  Atmospheric Correction for the Troposphere and Stratosphere in Radio Ranging Satellites , 2013 .

[30]  Xingxing Li,et al.  Retrieving of atmospheric parameters from multi‐GNSS in real time: Validation with water vapor radiometer and numerical weather model , 2015 .

[31]  Witold Rohm,et al.  Ground-based GNSS ZTD/IWV estimation system for numerical weather prediction in challenging weather conditions , 2014 .

[32]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[33]  Galina Dick,et al.  Integrated water vapor from IGS ground-based GPS observations: initial results from a global 5-min data set , 2009 .

[34]  Junhong Wang,et al.  Global estimates of water‐vapor‐weighted mean temperature of the atmosphere for GPS applications , 2005 .

[35]  Steven Businger,et al.  GPS Meteorology: Mapping Zenith Wet Delays onto Precipitable Water , 1994 .

[36]  Tajul Ariffin Musa,et al.  GPS meteorology in a low-latitude region: Remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor over the Malaysian Peninsula , 2011 .

[37]  Witold Rohm,et al.  Capturing the Signature of Severe Weather Events in Australia Using GPS Measurements , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[38]  O. Bock,et al.  Atmospheric modeling in GPS data analysis for high accuracy positioning , 2001 .

[39]  John M. Forsythe,et al.  Weather and climate analyses using improved global water vapor observations , 2012 .

[40]  Norman T. O'Neill,et al.  Multisensor analysis of integrated atmospheric water vapor over Canada and Alaska , 2003 .

[41]  Yibin Yao,et al.  A global empirical model for mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water vapor using GGOS Atmosphere data , 2015, Science China Earth Sciences.