Maximum inclusion size in two clean steels Part 1 Comparison of maximum size estimates by statistics of extremes and generalised Pareto distribution methods
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Murakami,et al. Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. II: Fatigue limit evaluation based on statistics for extreme values of inclusion size , 1989 .
[2] Stefano Beretta,et al. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DEFECTS FOR FATIGUE STRENGTH PREDICTION AND QUALITY CONTROL OF MATERIALS , 1998 .
[3] Yukitaka Murakami,et al. Critical Review of the Inclusion Rating by JIS-G-0555 Method and New Inclusion Rating Based on Statistics of Extreme and Its Applications , 1993 .
[4] C. Anderson,et al. The Measurement of Averages and Extremes of Environmental Variables , 1994, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[5] C. Anderson,et al. Critical Levels of Ozone Over the United Kingdom: Mapping Aggregate Exceedances Over Moderate to High Thresholds , 1994 .
[6] I. T. Young,et al. Quantitative Microscopy , 1984, Definitions.
[7] Helen V. Atkinson,et al. Application of the generalized pareto distribution to the estimation of the size of the maximum inclusion in clean steels , 1999 .
[8] Masayuki Takada,et al. Super-long life tension–compression fatigue properties of quenched and tempered 0.46% carbon steel , 1998 .
[9] Y. Murakami. Inclusion Rating by Statistics of Extreme Values and Its Application to Fatigue Strength Prediction and Quality Control of Materials , 1994, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[10] Masahiro Endo,et al. Defect tolerant design of automotive components , 1997 .
[11] C. W. Anderson,et al. Comparison of extreme value statistics methods for predicting maximum inclusion size in clean steels , 1999 .
[12] C. Anderson. The Aggregate Excess Measure of Severity of Extreme Events , 1994, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[13] Y. Murakami,et al. Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength , 1994 .
[14] K. Kawakami,et al. Quantitative evaluation of effects of shape and size of artificially introduced alumina particles on the fatigue strength of 1.5NiCrMo (En24) steel , 1991 .
[15] David Walshaw,et al. Getting the Most From Your Extreme Wind Data: A Step by Step Guide , 1994, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[16] Y. Murakami,et al. Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. I: Basic fatigue mechanism and evaluation of correlation between the fatigue fracture stress and the size and location of non-metallic inclusions , 1989 .
[17] T. Toriyama,et al. Effects of Nonmetallic Inclusions and Small Surface Pits on the Fatigue Strength of a High Strength Steel at Two Hardness Levels , 1991 .
[18] Y. Tomita. Effect of desulphurization and calcium treatments on the inclusion morphology of 0.4C-Cr-Mo-Ni steel , 1994 .
[19] P. Prescott,et al. Maximum likeiihood estimation of the parameters of the three-parameter generalized extreme-value distribution from censored samples , 1983 .
[20] Yukitaka Murakami,et al. Instructions for a New Method of Inclusion Rating and Correlations with the Fatigue Limit , 1994 .
[21] T. Toriyama,et al. Effects of Chemical Composition of Nonmetallic Inclusions on Fatigue Strength of High Strength Steels , 1993 .