Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities

Microblogging is a new form of communication in which users can describe their current status in short posts distributed by instant messages, mobile phones, email or the Web. Twitter, a popular microblogging tool has seen a lot of growth since it launched in October, 2006. In this paper, we present our observations of the microblogging phenomena by studying the topological and geographical properties of Twitter's social network. We find that people use microblogging to talk about their daily activities and to seek or share information. Finally, we analyze the user intentions associated at a community level and show how users with similar intentions connect with each other.

[1]  P. Strawson.  Intention and Convention in Speech Acts , 1964 .

[2]  H. Grice.  Utterer's meaning and intentions , 1969 .

[3]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues , 1979 .

[4]  J. Allen.  Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances , 1982 .

[5]  M. Brady,et al.  Recognizing Intentions From Natural Language Utterances , 1983 .

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[7]  M. KleinbergJon.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999 .

[8]  J. Kaczorowski,et al.  On the structure , 1999 .

[9]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[10]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Trawling the Web for Emerging Cyber-Communities , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Paul Rayson,et al.  Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling , 2000, Proceedings of the workshop on Comparing corpora -.

[12]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Shinichi Kimura,et al.  Example-based Speech Intention Understanding and Its Application to In-Car Spoken Dialogue System , 2002, COLING.

[14]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Self-Organization and Identification of Web Communities , 2002, Computer.

[16]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[17]  Gary William Flake,et al.  Self-organization of the web and identification of communities , 2002 .

[18]  Li Sheng-mei,et al.  On the Structure of "秀才秀才,错字布袋 , 2003 .

[19]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Why we blog , 2004, CACM.

[20]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Debora Donato,et al.  Large scale properties of the Webgraph , 2004 .

[22]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[23]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[24]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Clique percolation in random networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[25]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Jasmine Novak,et al.  Geographic routing in social networks , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[27]  Thomas M. Lento.  The Ties that Blog: Examining the Relationship Between Social Ties and Continued Participation in the Wallop Weblogging System , 2006 .

[28]  Yun Chi,et al.  Discovery of Blog Communities based on Mutual Awareness , 2006 .

[29]  Sougata Mukherjea,et al.  On the structural properties of massive telecom call graphs: findings and implications , 2006, CIKM '06.

[30]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Looking at the Blogosphere Topology through Different Lenses , 2007, ICWSM.

[31]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  On the Structure, Properties and Utility of Internal Corporate Blogs , 2007, ICWSM.

[32]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[33]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .