The response of male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to same- and mixed-sex over-marks depends on the reproductive state of the top- and bottom-female scent donors

Many female terrestrial mammals undergo postpartum estrus (PPE), a state of heightened sexual attractiveness to male conspecifics relative to females not in PPE (REF females). PPE and REF females of several species may use over-marks to maintain territories and attract and indicate interest in males as potential mates. In our first two experiments, we determined if the response of male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to the top- and bottom-scent donors of a same-sex over-mark was affected by the reproductive state of the scent donors. We found that after exposure to a same-sex over-mark in which the female scent donors were in the same reproductive state, males spent more time investigating the mark of the top-scent female. Males, however, spent more time investigating the mark of the PPE female to that of a female not in PPE, independent of the position of either female’s scent mark in the over-mark. The third and fourth experiments determined if the response of males to the female scent donor of a mixed-sex over-mark was affected by whether she is the top- or bottom-scent donor. In three of the four comparisons, males spent more time investigating the mark of a novel PPE female (not in the over-mark) to that of the top- or bottom-scent female. In addition, males spent similar amounts of time investigating the mark of a novel female not in PPE and that of a top-scent PPE female. However, males spent more time investigating the novel REF female’s mark compared to that of a bottom-scent PPE female. The results are discussed in terms of the natural history and mating strategies of male meadow voles.

[1]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Dietary protein content affects the response of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to over-marks , 2011, acta ethologica.

[2]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Responses of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus , to areas containing over-marks and single scent marks of two opposite-sex conspecifics , 2011 .

[3]  M. Ferkin,et al.  The presence and number of male competitor's scent marks and female reproductive state affect the response of male meadow voles to female conspecifics' odours , 2011 .

[4]  Stan Franklin,et al.  Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, have the capacity to recall the “what”, “where”, and “when” of a single past event , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[5]  Andrew A. Pierce,et al.  Perspectives on over-marking: is it good to be on top? , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[6]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Risk of sperm competition does not influence copulatory behavior in the promiscuous meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[7]  M. Ferkin The amount of time that a meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, self-grooms is affected by its reproductive state and that of the odor donor , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[8]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Male meadow voles respond differently to risk and intensity of sperm competition , 2006 .

[9]  J. D. Neill,et al.  Knobil and Neill's Physiology of reproduction , 2006 .

[10]  R. Beynon,et al.  Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[11]  M. Ferkin,et al.  The Reproductive State of Female Voles Affects their Scent Marking Behavior and the Responses of Male Conspecifics to Such Marks , 2004 .

[12]  D. Madison Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  R. Johnston CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION IN RODENTS: FROM PHEROMONES TO INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION , 2003 .

[14]  H. Fisher,et al.  Countermarking by male pygmy lorises (Nycticebus pygmaeus): do females use odor cues to select mates with high competitive ability? , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  M. Ferkin,et al.  The response of meadow voles to an over-mark in which the two donors differ in gonadal hormone status , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and prairie voles (M. ochrogaster) differ in their responses to over-marks from opposite- and same-sex conspecifics , 2000 .

[17]  T. Birkhead Promiscuity: An Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition , 2000 .

[18]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Response of prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster (Rodentia, Arvicolidae), to scent over-marks of two same-sex conspecifics : A test of the scent-masking hypothesis , 1999 .

[19]  C. Snowdon,et al.  Scent-marking behavior in wild groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  J. Bergeron,et al.  Multiple paternity in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): investigating the role of the female , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  R. Johnston,et al.  WHAT KIND OF INFORMATION DO MEADOW VOLES (MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS) USE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE TOP AND BOTTOM SCENT OF AN OVER-MARK? , 1999 .

[22]  J. Hurst,et al.  Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The integrative neurobiology of affiliation. Introduction. , 1997, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppes , 2000 .

[25]  R. Johnston,et al.  Odors Providing Sexual Information in Djungarian Hamsters: Evidence for an Across-Odor Code , 1996, Hormones and Behavior.

[26]  R. Johnston,et al.  Scent counter marks: selective memory for the top scent by golden hamsters , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  R. Johnston,et al.  Effects of pregnancy, lactation and postpartum oestrus on odour signals and the attraction to odours in female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  R. Johnston,et al.  The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  C. D. Rudd Sexual behaviour of male and female tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) at post‐partum oestrus , 1994 .

[30]  Theresa M. Lee,et al.  Female meadow voles have a preferred mating pattern predicted by photoperiod, which influences fertility , 1993, Physiology & Behavior.

[31]  J. O. Wolff Why are female small mammals territorial , 1993 .

[32]  R. Boonstra,et al.  Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1993 .

[33]  C. Snowdon,et al.  Circulating and excreted hormones during the ovarian cycle in the cotton‐top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus , 1993, American journal of primatology.

[34]  E. Jones Effects of Forage Availability on Home Range and Population Density of Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1990 .

[35]  J. Hurst Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus rutty. I. Communication between males , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Modes of estrus induction as a factor in studies of the reproductive behavior of rodents , 1990, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[37]  C. Carter,et al.  Patterns of behaviour during postpartum oestrus in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Social odours in mammals , 1985 .

[39]  A. Gilbert Postpartum and lactational estrus: a comparative analysis in rodentia. , 1984, Journal of comparative psychology.

[40]  R. Johnston 1 – Chemical Signals and Reproductive Behavior , 1983 .

[41]  R. Johnston Olfactory preferences, scent marking, and “proceptivity” in female hamsters , 1979, Hormones and Behavior.

[42]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Pregnancy initiation in postpartum estrus in three species of muroid rodents , 1979, Hormones and Behavior.