Benefiting from Others in Organizational Adaptation

Organizational adaptation is typically analyzed in simulation settings where organizations strive to improve their own past performance, without regard to the relative performance, fitness or capabilities of others. In this paper, we introduce the notion of interactive search, which we define as an intentional process of adaptation that is guided by the outcomes of the efforts of both the organization itself and those of others. Using an agent-based simulation model we consider how less successful organizations benefit from observing and considering the adaptive trajectories already established by more successful organizations. Our findings show not only that taking into account the behavior of others, accrues benefits in adaptive fitness, but also that the strongest benefit comes from observing and following others in ways that are much more subtle than pure emulation. Organizations that use others’ behavior merely as a preferential direction for their own adaptive choices fare even better. This result stems from the more general finding that the impediments to an organization’s ability or inclination to observe or follow others do not necessarily affect adaptation negatively. In many cases their impact is even beneficial.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[3]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[4]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[5]  A. Roth The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics , 2002 .

[6]  Peter Moran,et al.  Becoming the best: by beating or ignoring the best? Toward an expanded view of the role of managerial selection in complex and turbulent environments , 2011 .

[7]  Gino Cattani,et al.  The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[8]  J. Kleijnen Analyzing simulation experiments with common random numbers , 1988 .

[9]  Richard L. Van Horn,et al.  Validation of Simulation Results , 1971 .

[10]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling: A Methodology for Neo-Schumpeterian Economics , 2005 .

[11]  Leigh Tesfatsion,et al.  Handbook of Computational Economics, Volume 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics (Handbook of Computational Economics) , 2006 .

[12]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[13]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Organizing to Strategize in the Face of Interactions: Preventing Premature Lock-in , 2006 .

[15]  J. March Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action , 1996 .

[16]  J. Holland,et al.  Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic Theory , 1991 .

[17]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  G. Vagnani,et al.  Corporate Governance as a Viable System: The Role of Intra and Inter-Systemic Relationships , 2002 .

[19]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[20]  Richard W. Conway,et al.  Some Tactical Problems in Digital Simulation , 1963 .

[21]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[22]  G. Fagiolo,et al.  Agent-based models for economic policy design: Introduction to the special issue , 2008 .

[23]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[24]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .