Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: This study aimed to compare echocardiographic findings in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: The PARTNER 3 trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) randomized 1000 patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk to undergo either transfemoral TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve or SAVR. Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained at baseline and at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure were analyzed by a consortium of 2 echocardiography core laboratories. Results: The percentage of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) was low and not statistically different between the TAVR and SAVR groups at 30 days (0.8% versus 0.2%; P=0.38). Mild AR was more frequent after TAVR than SAVR at 30 days (28.8% versus 4.2%; P<0.001). At 1 year, mean transvalvular gradient (13.7±5.6 versus 11.6±5.0 mm Hg; P=0.12) and aortic valve area (1.72±0.37 versus 1.76±0.42 cm2; P=0.12) were similar in TAVR and SAVR. The percentage of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch at 30 days was low and similar between TAVR and SAVR (4.6 versus 6.3%; P=0.30). Valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva), which reflects total left ventricular hemodynamic burden, was lower with TAVR than SAVR at 1 year (3.7±0.8 versus 3.9±0.9 mm Hg/mL/m2; P<0.001). Tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion decreased and the percentage of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation increased from baseline to 1 year in SAVR but remained unchanged in TAVR. Irrespective of treatment arm, high Zva and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, but not moderate to severe AR or severe prosthesis–patient mismatch, were associated with increased risk of the composite end point of mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year. Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk, TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve was associated with similar percentage of moderate or severe AR compared with SAVR but higher percentage of mild AR. Transprosthetic gradients, valve areas, percentage of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch, and left ventricular mass regression were similar in TAVR and SAVR. SAVR was associated with significant deterioration of right ventricular systolic function and greater tricuspid regurgitation, which persisted at 1 year. High Zva and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion were associated with worse outcome at 1 year whereas AR and severe prosthesis–patient mismatch were not. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02675114.

[1]  E. Blackstone,et al.  Right ventricular function is reduced during cardiac surgery independent of procedural characteristics, reoperative status, or pericardiotomy. , 2020, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Invasive Versus Echocardiographic Evaluation of Transvalvular Gradients Immediately Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  N. Weissman,et al.  Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Socie , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic‐Valve Replacement with a Balloon‐Expandable Valve in Low‐Risk Patients , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Andrew S. Mugglin,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic‐Valve Replacement with a Self‐Expanding Valve in Low‐Risk Patients , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  L. Svensson,et al.  The incidence and prognostic implications of worsening right ventricular function after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from PARTNER IIA , 2018, European heart journal.

[7]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Bioprosthetic aortic valve durability in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2018, Heart.

[8]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Standardized Definition of Structural Valve Degeneration for Surgical and Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves. , 2018, Circulation.

[9]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Association of Paravalvular Regurgitation With 1-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3 Valve , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[10]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2017, European heart journal.

[11]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  F. Veglia,et al.  Postoperative Echocardiographic Reduction of Right Ventricular Function: Is Pericardial Opening Modality the Main Culprit? , 2017, BioMed research international.

[13]  J. Chambers,et al.  Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  Andrew S. Mugglin,et al.  Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic‐Valve Replacement in Intermediate‐Risk Patients , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Zamorano,et al.  Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[18]  M. Mack,et al.  Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes. , 2015, European heart journal.

[19]  S. Kaul Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  G. Bloomfield,et al.  Implementation of echocardiography core laboratory best practices: a case study of the PARTNER I trial. , 2013, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[22]  Scott Lim,et al.  Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Stuart J Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[26]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Staging Cardiac Damage in Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[29]  K. Hashimoto Department of Cardiovascular Surgery , 2008 .