Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature

BackgroundChlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opinions of women about being screened, tested and diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis.MethodsOnline databases (MEDLINE, Meditext, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and reference lists searched up to August 2005. Search terms: chlamydia, attitude, attitude to health, interview, qualitative, women. Eligibility criteria: about chlamydia, included women, involved interviews/surveys/focus groups, looked at women's views/opinions/attitudes, published in English. Thematic analysis identified the main and recurrent themes emerging from the literature. We compared our thematic analysis with the Theory of Planned Behaviour to provide a model that could assist in planning chlamydia screening programs.ResultsFrom 561 identified articles, 25 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. 22: USA, UK; 3: Holland, Sweden, Australia. Major themes identified: need for knowledge and information, choice and support; concerns about confidentiality, cost, fear, anxiety and stigma. Women are more likely to find chlamydia screening/testing acceptable if they think chlamydia is a serious, common condition which can cause infertility and if they understand that chlamydia infection can be asymptomatic. Women want a range of options for chlamydia testing including urine tests, self-administered swabs, pelvic exams and clinician-collected swabs, home-testing and community-based testing. Tests should be free, easy and quick. Women want support for dealing with the implications of a chlamydia diagnosis, they feel chlamydia diagnoses need to be normalised and destigmatised and they want assistance with partner notification. Women need to know that their confidentiality will be maintained.ConclusionOur review found that women from various countries and ethnic backgrounds share similar views regarding chlamydia screening, testing and diagnosis. The acknowledged importance of women's views in planning an effective chlamydia screening program is expanded in this review which details the nature and complexity of such views and considers their likely impact.

[1]  J. P. Davis,et al.  Decreased Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Associated With a Selective Screening Program in Family Planning Clinics in Wisconsin , 1993, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[2]  J. Lindbäck,et al.  Is the Increase in Notifications of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Sweden the Result of Changes in Prevalence, Sampling Frequency or Diagnostic Methods? , 2002, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  E. Johansson,et al.  ``One-night stands'' — risky trips between lust and trust: qualitative interviews with Chlamydia trachomatis infected youth in north Sweden , 2003, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[4]  N. Low Current status of chlamydia screening in Europe , 2004 .

[5]  M. R. Howell,et al.  Preference Among Female Army Recruits for Use of Self-Administrated Vaginal Swabs or Urine to Screen for Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infections , 2003, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[6]  K. Fenton,et al.  Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[7]  B. Budenholzer Glycaemia and vascular effects of type 2 diabetes. Lowering glucose concentrations may not be of any value in itself. , 2001, BMJ.

[8]  J. M. Oakes,et al.  Improving participation in Chlamydia screening programs: perspectives of high-risk youth. , 2003, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[9]  S. Coupey,et al.  Are adolescent girls with Chlamydia infection notifying their partners? , 2001, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[10]  J. Kaldor,et al.  The prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in Australia 1997-2004: a systematic review. , 2005, Sexual health.

[11]  M. Reid,et al.  An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[13]  G. Hart,et al.  A social science perspective on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. , 1999, Sexually transmitted infections.

[14]  M. Velasquez,et al.  Gonorrhea and chlamydia screening in sexually active young women: the processes of change. , 2004, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[15]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Young adults' attitudes, beliefs, and feelings about testing for curable STDs outside of clinic settings. , 2004, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[16]  L. Sanci,et al.  Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people. , 2007, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[17]  R. Chessick,et al.  Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process , 1995 .

[18]  S. Scholle,et al.  Chlamydia screening among sexually active young female enrollees of health plans--United States, 1999-2001. , 2004, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[19]  R. DiClemente,et al.  New sexual partners and readiness to seek screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: Predictors among young women , 2005 .

[20]  J. van Bergen Acceptability of home screening for chlamydial infection: some remaining issues , 2000, Sexually transmitted infections.

[21]  G. Ridgway,et al.  Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women? , 2000, Sexually transmitted infections.

[22]  C. Gaydos,et al.  Female Prisoners’ Preferences of Collection Methods for Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection , 2003, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[23]  K. Tebb,et al.  Home STI testing: the adolescent female's opinion. , 2004, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[24]  M. Egger,et al.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Uppsala County, Sweden, 1985–1993: Declining Rates for How Much Longer? , 1995, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[25]  S. Capewell,et al.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and its consequences in people attending a genitourinary medicine clinic. , 1999, Sexually transmitted infections.

[26]  C. Wibbelsman,et al.  What sexually transmitted disease screening method does the adolescent prefer? Adolescents' attitudes toward first-void urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and pelvic examination. , 2002, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[27]  C. Lau,et al.  Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline for Genital Chlamydial Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials , 2002, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[28]  C. Carlisle,et al.  Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: Acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[29]  J. Popay,et al.  Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[30]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis Testing in the Second British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles: Respondent Uptake and Treatment Outcomes , 2005, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[31]  J. Cassell,et al.  Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: a qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[32]  M. Chacko,et al.  Gonorrhea and chlamydia screening among young women: stage of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[33]  G. Hart,et al.  Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  G. Ridgway,et al.  The acceptability of urinary LCR testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among participants in a probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles , 2001, Sexually transmitted infections.

[35]  T. Schwarz,et al.  [Genital chlamydial infections]. , 1986, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[36]  Michael Billington One Night Stands , 1993 .

[37]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Choosing and using services for sexual health: a qualitative study of women's views , 2001, Sexually transmitted infections.

[38]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[39]  R. Slack,et al.  Psychosocial impacts of chlamydia testing are important , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  S. Wyke,et al.  Women's experiences of Chlamydia screening , 2003, The European journal of general practice.