Identification of Contaminant Type in Surface Electromyography (EMG) Signals

The ability to recognize various forms of contaminants in surface electromyography (EMG) signals and to ascertain the overall quality of such signals is important in many EMG-enabled rehabilitation systems. In this paper, new methods for the automatic identification of commonly occurring contaminant types in surface EMG signals are presented. Such methods are advantageous because the contaminant type is typically not known in advance. The presented approach uses support vector machines as the main classification system. Both simulated and real EMG signals are used to assess the performance of the methods. The contaminants considered include: 1) electrocardiogram interference; 2) motion artifact; 3) power line interference; 4) amplifier saturation; and 5) additive white Gaussian noise. Results show that the contaminants can readily be distinguished at lower signal to noise ratios, with a growing degree of confusion at higher signal to noise ratios, where their effects on signal quality are less significant.

[1]  P.S. Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of methods for adaptive removal of motion artifact , 2000, Computers in Cardiology 2000. Vol.27 (Cat. 00CH37163).

[2]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Support Vector Machine-Based Classification Scheme for Myoelectric Control Applied to Upper Limb , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  A E Grassino,et al.  Automatic assessment of electromyogram quality. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[5]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Detection of ADC clipping, quantization noise, and amplifier saturation in surface electromyography , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings.

[6]  J. Stefan Karlsson,et al.  On-line signal quality estimation of multichannel surface electromyograms , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[9]  Tanu Sharma,et al.  A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern recognition , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  J. Webster Reducing Motion Artifacts and Interference in Biopotential Recording , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  A. Grassino,et al.  Automatic selection of uncontaminated electromyogram as applied to respiratory muscle fatigue. , 1984, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[12]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[13]  Marco Gazzoni Multichannel surface electromyography in ergonomics: Potentialities and limits , 2010 .

[14]  T Moritani,et al.  Effects of ageing on motor unit activation patterns and reflex sensitivity in dynamic movements. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  N.V. Thakor,et al.  Applications of adaptive filtering to ECG analysis: noise cancellation and arrhythmia detection , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J. Basilakis,et al.  Biosignal quality detection: An essential feature for unsupervised telehealth applications , 2010, The 12th IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services.

[18]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Automated Biosignal Quality Analysis for Electromyography Using a One-Class Support Vector Machine , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[19]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Removal of electrocardiogram artifacts in surface electromyography using a moving average method , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings.

[20]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  CleanEMG — Power line interference estimation in sEMG using an adaptive least squares algorithm , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Valentina Agostini,et al.  An Algorithm for the Estimation of the Signal-To-Noise Ratio in Surface Myoelectric Signals Generated During Cyclic Movements , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  R. Scott,et al.  A Nonstationary Model for the Electromyogram , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in detection and processing techniques. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[24]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[25]  E L Morin,et al.  Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[26]  Dinesh Kant Kumar,et al.  Surface EMG model of the bicep during aging: A preliminary study , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Outlier detection in high-density surface electromyographic signals , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[28]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Biosignal quality analysis of surface EMG using a correlation coefficient test for normality , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA).