Taxonomic Repeatability: An Experimental Approach

Moss, W. W. (Div. Entomol., U. Calif., Berkeley 94720). 1971. Taxonomic repeatability: an experimental approach. Syst. Zool., 20:309-330.-Two groups of workers from two universities assigned phenetic similarities, intuitively and numerically, to two sets of test objects (Caminalcules). The results of these studies were analyzed for correspondence and relative variability, and contrasted in various ways. [Numerical phenetics; Experimental taxonomy.]

[1]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  Principles of Animal Taxonomy , 1961 .

[2]  G. N. Lance,et al.  Mixed-Data Classificatory Programs I - Agglomerative Systems , 1967, Aust. Comput. J..

[3]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[4]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  The Biological Species Concept: A Critical Evaluation , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[5]  D. Eades Theoretical and Procedural Aspects of Numerical Phyletics , 1970 .

[6]  G. N. Lance,et al.  Mixed-Data Classificatory Programs II - Divisive Systems , 1968, Aust. Comput. J..

[7]  L. A. Johnson,et al.  Rainbow's end: the quest for an optimal taxonomy. , 1970, Systematic zoology.

[8]  E. Mayr The role of systematics in biology. , 1968, Science.

[9]  D. H. Colless,et al.  The Phylogenetic Fallacy , 1967 .

[10]  R. Sokal,et al.  Random Scanning of Taxonomic Characters , 1966, Nature.

[11]  E. J. Burr Cluster Sorting with Mixed Character Types, I - Standardization of Character Values , 1968, Aust. Comput. J..

[12]  W. T. Williams,et al.  Angiosperm taxonomy: a comparative study of some novel numerical techniques , 1966 .

[13]  R. Blackith,et al.  A numerical taxonomy of Orthopteroid insects , 1968 .

[14]  David J. Rogers Taximetrics—New name, old concept , 1963, Brittonia.

[15]  J. Hendrickson Clustering in numerical cladistics: A minimum-length directed tree problem , 1968 .

[16]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  Distance as a Measure of Taxonomic Similarity , 1961 .

[17]  R. Sokal,et al.  A METHOD FOR DEDUCING BRANCHING SEQUENCES IN PHYLOGENY , 1965 .

[18]  G. Schnell A Phenetic Study of the Suborder Lari (Aves) I. Methods and Results of Principal Components Analyses , 1970 .

[19]  D. H. Colless The Phenogram as an Estimate of Phylogeny , 1970 .

[20]  E. Mayr Numerical Phenetics and Taxonomic Theory , 1965 .

[21]  R. Lange,et al.  Experimental appraisal of certain procedures for the classification of data. , 1965, Australian journal of biological sciences.

[22]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1970 .

[23]  P. H. A. Sneath,et al.  Some experiments in the numerical analysis of archaeological data , 1966 .

[24]  S. T. Cowan,et al.  An electro-taxonomic survey of bacteria. , 1958, Journal of general microbiology.

[25]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  Principles of systematic zoology , 1969 .

[26]  R. Rollins ON THE BASES OF BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION , 1965 .

[27]  R. Sokal,et al.  THE INTELLIGENT IGNORAMUS, AN EXPERIMENT IN NUMERICAL TAXONOMY * , 1970 .

[28]  R. Sokal,et al.  THE COMPARISON OF DENDROGRAMS BY OBJECTIVE METHODS , 1962 .

[29]  E. Anderson EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE SPECIES CONCEPT , 1968 .

[30]  W. R. Lockhart Factors Affecting Reproducibility of Numerical Classifications , 1967, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.

[32]  R. B. Selander,et al.  Ecology, behavior, and adult anatomy of the Albida Group of the genus Epicauta : (Coleoptera, Meloidae) , 1969 .

[33]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  A RANDOMIZATION TEST OF THE NON SPECIFICITY HYPOTHESIS IN NUMERICAL TAXONOMY , 1965 .

[34]  E. Mayr Classification and Phylogeny , 1965, Australian Water Bugs. (Hemiptera - Heteroptera, Gerromorpha & Nepomorpha).

[35]  C. Michener Some Future Developments in Taxonomy , 1963 .