Accuracy comparison between Gompertz and polynomial based PV models

Various photovoltaic PV models of different complexity exist in the literature. The modeling accuracy for most of them is directly related to their complexity and computational effort. Recently, two newly developed PV models featuring low computational effort and high accuracy appeared in the literature. The first model is developed based on Gompertz model which is originally used to model human mortality, and the second relies on a polynomial function which represents the voltage drop in the model series resistance. Because both models have similar features, their pros and cons are not clear and thus it is challenging for users to decide which model is more suitable for a particular PV application. This paper constructs a comparison between the two models showing their pros and cons. The results of the paper would be beneficial for PV system designers and researchers to select the appropriate model for a specific PV application.

[1]  E. El-Saadany,et al.  Accuracy Improvement of the Ideal PV Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[2]  Weidong Xiao,et al.  Topology review of single phase grid-connected module integrated converters for PV applications , 2012, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[3]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Optimal sizing of PV-battery for loss reduction and intermittency mitigation , 2014, International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE-2014).

[4]  Jih-Sheng Lai,et al.  High Efficiency Photovoltaic Source Simulator with Fast Response Time for Solar Power Conditioning Systems Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[5]  Yousef Mahmoud,et al.  Fast Power-Peaks Estimator for Partially Shaded PV Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Emilio Gomez-Lazaro,et al.  A New Solar Module Modeling for PV Applications Based on a Symmetrized and Shifted Gompertz Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  A. M. N. Lima,et al.  Combining Model-Based and Heuristic Techniques for Fast Tracking the Maximum-Power Point of Photovoltaic Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  D. Chan,et al.  Analytical methods for the extraction of solar-cell single- and double-diode model parameters from I-V characteristics , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[9]  Weidong Xiao,et al.  A Parameterization Approach for Enhancing PV Model Accuracy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Xue Feng,et al.  Hybrid Energy Storage With Multimode Fuzzy Power Allocator for PV Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[11]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of solar photovoltaic technologies: Literature review , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[12]  H. H. Zeineldin,et al.  A Simple Approach to Modeling and Simulation of Photovoltaic Modules , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[13]  Yousef Mahmoud,et al.  Improving the accuracy of the single diode PV models , 2015 .

[14]  Ehab F. El-Saadany,et al.  A Photovoltaic Model With Reduced Computational Time , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  M. Negnevitsky,et al.  Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking approaches suitable for PV systems under Partial Shading Conditions , 2013, 2013 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC).

[16]  Mohammad Reza Azizian,et al.  On the Parameter Extraction of a Five-Parameter Double-Diode Model of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[17]  Mutlu Boztepe,et al.  Global MPPT Scheme for Photovoltaic String Inverters Based on Restricted Voltage Window Search Algorithm , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[18]  Saravana Ilango Ganesan,et al.  Impact of partial shading on the output power of PV systems under partial shading conditions , 2014 .