Distributing power, a transition to a civic energy future: Report of the Realising Transition Pathways Research Consortium ‘Engine Room’

The overarching challenge for UK energy policy is to ensure the delivery of secure, affordable energy in a way that meets the emission reductions targets laid out in the Climate Change Act (2008). The EPSRCfunded Transition Pathways (TP) and, more recently, Realising Transition Pathways (RTP) projects have both argued that multiple logics of governance, ownership, and control of the electricity system can be followed to address the energy trilemma. This work has developed three transition pathways for the UK energy system, each driven by different governance patterns. Each pathway has a specific technological mix, institutional architecture, and societal drivers. These pathways are: Central Co-ordination: Central to this pathway is the role of the nation state in actively delivering the transition. Market Rules: After the creation of a broad policy framework, the state allows competition and private companies to deliver sustainable, affordable energy. Thousand Flowers: This pathway is characterised by a greatly expanded role for civil society in delivering distributed low-carbon generation. The following report focuses on the Thousand Flowers pathway. There is growing interest, from a range of stakeholders, in the potential of distributed low-carbon electricity generation in delivering a low-carbon energy system. Yet there are still significant gaps in understanding, particularly regarding the feasibility of scaling up distributed generation from technological, governance, regulation, policy, and financial perspectives. The aim of this report is to address these gaps within the context of the Thousand Flowers pathway. This research was carried out by the ‘Engine Room’ of the EPSRC-funded Realising Transition Pathways (RTP) consortium. The ‘Engine Room’ was established to facilitate interdisciplinary work across the consortium and consists of research fellows and doctoral researchers from different fields in the nine partner institutions. Engine Room workshops and meetings give researchers the space to present their work and develop and exchange ideas with their peers. This report is an output of a series of interdisciplinary Engine Room workshops held throughout 2013/14 which also drew on contributions from energy industry stakeholders. These workshops brought together the current research and cumulative findings of the Realising Transition Pathways consortium, to examine the consequences of a transition from a centralised energy system to one where distributed generation plays a much greater role (50% of final electricity demand), and is delivered by a civic energy sector. In this report we do not present any panaceas, attempt to preference a civil response to energy transition, or claim technological infallibility. We do, however, explore the potential of a distributed energy future and investigate the technological trajectory it could follow, along with an institutional architecture compatible with its development. We acknowledge throughout that this is a challenging but realistic system transition.

[1]  박진철 Passive House의 적용방안 , 2010 .

[2]  Graham Ault,et al.  Modelling generation and infrastructure requirements for transition pathways , 2013 .

[3]  Monica Giulietti,et al.  Revenues from Storage in a Competitive Electricity Market: Empirical Evidence from Great Britain , 2014 .

[4]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future , 2013 .

[5]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Smart control for minimizing distribution network reinforcement cost due to electrification , 2013 .

[6]  T. Foxon,et al.  The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition , 2013 .

[7]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Scenarios for the development of smart grids in the UK: literature review , 2014 .

[8]  P. Schönberger Municipalities as key actors of German renewable energy governance: An analysis of opportunities, obstacles, and multi-level influences , 2013 .

[9]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[10]  Athula D. Rajapakse,et al.  Microgrids research: A review of experimental microgrids and test systems , 2011 .

[11]  G. Strbac,et al.  Efficient system integration of wind generation through smart charging of electric vehicles , 2013, 2013 Eighth International Conference and Exhibition on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER).

[12]  J. Driesen,et al.  Control of Microgrids , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[13]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Discrete demand side control performance under dynamic building simulation : a heat pump application , 2012 .

[14]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[15]  Ronan Bolton,et al.  UK Local Authority engagement with the Energy Service Company (ESCo) model: Key characteristics, benefits, limitations and considerations , 2015 .

[16]  Chris J. Martin,et al.  Towards resource-efficient and service-oriented integrated infrastructure operation , 2015 .

[17]  T. Foxon,et al.  Urban Infrastructure Dynamics: Market Regulation and the Shaping of District Energy in UK Cities , 2013 .

[18]  Geoff Hammond,et al.  The Implications of Upstream Emissions from the Power Sector , 2014 .

[19]  E. McKenna,et al.  Demand response behaviour of domestic consumers with photovoltaic systems in the UK: an exploratory analysis of an internet discussion forum , 2014 .

[20]  M. Bolinger Community wind power ownership schemes in Europe and their relevance to the United States , 2001 .

[21]  Robert Lasseter,et al.  Smart Distribution: Coupled Microgrids , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  Anna Schreuer,et al.  Energy cooperatives and local ownership in the field of renewable energy technologies: a literature review , 2010 .

[23]  S. Miller,et al.  The Effect of ESCOs on Energy Use , 2012 .

[24]  Graeme Burt,et al.  Approaches to Network Protection for Inverter Dominated Electrical Distribution Systems , 2006 .

[25]  Tianshu Bi,et al.  Advanced islanding detection utilized in distribution systems with DFIG , 2014 .

[26]  Stephen Hall,et al.  Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution , 2014 .

[27]  David Buchan,et al.  The Energiewende – Germany’s gamble , 2012 .

[28]  C. Clastres Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives , 2011 .

[29]  Corrado Topi,et al.  The Economics of Low Carbon Cities: A Mini-Stern Review for the Leeds City Region , 2012 .

[30]  Yunfei Mu,et al.  A Spatial–Temporal model for grid impact analysis of plug-in electric vehicles ☆ , 2014 .

[31]  Edward Vine,et al.  An international survey of the energy service company (ESCO) industry , 2005 .

[32]  T. Foxon A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy , 2011 .

[33]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition , 2014 .

[34]  John P. Barton,et al.  Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity system : Comparing scenarios and technology implications , 2018 .

[35]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[36]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Decentralized Coordination of Microgrids With Flexible Demand and Energy Storage , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[37]  Aikaterini Fragaki,et al.  Do liberalised electricity markets help or hinder CHP and district heating? The case of the UK , 2008 .

[38]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? , 2008 .

[39]  M. Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. , 2007 .

[40]  S. Wood,et al.  A techno-economic analysis of small-scale, biomass-fuelled combined heat and power for community housing. , 2011 .

[41]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Making electricity networks “visible”: Industry actor representations of “publics” and public engagement in infrastructure planning , 2012 .

[42]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Assessing heat pumps as flexible load , 2013 .

[43]  J. Palm Development of sustainable energy systems in Swedish municipalities: A matter of path dependency and power relations , 2006 .

[44]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Scenarios for the development of smart grids in the UK: synthesis report , 2014 .

[45]  F. Noor,et al.  Unintentional islanding and comparison of prevention techniques , 2005, Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005..

[46]  A. Cumbers,et al.  Repossessing the Future A Common Weal Strategy for Community and Democratic Ownership of Scotland's Energy Resources , 2013 .

[47]  J. Steinberger,et al.  Profiting from negawatts: Reducing absolute consumption and emissions through a performance-based energy economy , 2009 .

[48]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[49]  Shirley J. Hansen Escos Around the World , 2009 .

[50]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Economic and Environmental Benefits of Dynamic Demand in Providing Frequency Regulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[51]  Fang Zheng Peng,et al.  Control for Grid-Connected and Intentional Islanding Operations of Distributed Power Generation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[52]  Bjarne Poulsen,et al.  Electric vehicle fleet integration in the danish EDISON project - A virtual power plant on the island of Bornholm , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[53]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[54]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Planetary Economics: Energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development , 2014 .

[55]  Edward Vine,et al.  Energy service companies in European countries: Current status and a strategy to foster their development , 2006 .